From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
To: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
Cc: mario.limonciello@amd.com, perry.yuan@amd.com, ray.huang@amd.com,
rafael@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: Add a callback to update the min_freq_req from drivers
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 12:11:50 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zv+OLnexTcFFXDiY@BLRRASHENOY1.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241003083952.3186-2-Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 08:39:52AM +0000, Dhananjay Ugwekar wrote:
> Currently, there is no proper way to update the initial lower frequency
> limit from cpufreq drivers. Only way is to add a new min_freq qos
> request from the driver side, but it leads to the issue explained below.
>
> The QoS infrastructure collates the constraints from multiple
> subsystems and saves them in a plist. The "current value" is defined to
> be the highest value in the plist for min_freq constraint.
>
> The cpufreq core adds a qos_request for min_freq to be 0 and the amd-pstate
> driver today adds qos request for min_freq to be lowest_freq, where
> lowest_freq corresponds to CPPC.lowest_perf.
>
> Eg: Suppose WLOG considering amd-pstate driver, lowest_freq is 400000 KHz,
> lowest_non_linear_freq is 1200000 KHz.
>
> At this point of time, the min_freq QoS plist looks like:
>
> head--> 400000 KHz (registered by amd-pstate) --> 0 KHz (registered by
> cpufreq core)
>
> When a user updates /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/cpufreq/scaling_min_freq,
> it only results in updating the cpufreq-core's node in the plist, where
> say 0 becomes the newly echoed value.
>
> Now, if the user echoes a value 1000000 KHz, to scaling_min_freq, then the
> new list would be
>
> head--> 1000000 KHz (registered by cpufreq core) --> 400000 KHz (registered
> by amd-pstate)
>
> and the new "current value" of the min_freq QoS constraint will be 1000000
> KHz, this is the scenario where it works as expected.
>
> Suppose we change the amd-pstate driver code's min_freq qos constraint
> to lowest_non_linear_freq instead of lowest_freq, then the user will
> never be able to request a value below that, due to the following:
>
> At boot time, the min_freq QoS plist would be
>
> head--> 1200000 KHz (registered by amd-pstate) --> 0 KHz (registered by
> cpufreq core)
>
> When the user echoes a value of 1000000 KHz, to
> /sys/devices/..../scaling_min_freq, then the new list would be
>
> head--> 1200000 KHz (registered by amd-pstate) --> 1000000 KHz (registered
> by cpufreq core)
>
> with the new "current value" of the min_freq QoS remaining 1200000 KHz.
> Since the current value has not changed, there won't be any notifications
> sent to the subsystems which have added their QoS constraints. In
> particular, the amd-pstate driver will not get the notification, and thus,
> the user's request to lower the scaling_min_freq will be ineffective.
>
> Hence, it is advisable to have a single source of truth for the min and
> max freq QoS constraints between the cpufreq and the cpufreq drivers.
>
> So add a new callback get_init_min_freq() add in struct cpufreq_driver,
> which allows amd-pstate (or any other cpufreq driver) to override the
> default min_freq value being set in the policy->min_freq_req. Now
> scaling_min_freq can be modified by the user to any value (lower or
> higher than the init value) later on if desired.
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>
Rafael and Viresh, could you please weigh in on this new callback.
--
Thanks and Regards
gautham.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 +++++-
> include/linux/cpufreq.h | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index f98c9438760c..2923068cf5f4 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1361,6 +1361,7 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
> bool new_policy;
> unsigned long flags;
> unsigned int j;
> + u32 init_min_freq = FREQ_QOS_MIN_DEFAULT_VALUE;
> int ret;
>
> pr_debug("%s: bringing CPU%u online\n", __func__, cpu);
> @@ -1445,9 +1446,12 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
> goto out_destroy_policy;
> }
>
> + if (cpufreq_driver->get_init_min_freq)
> + init_min_freq = cpufreq_driver->get_init_min_freq(policy);
> +
> ret = freq_qos_add_request(&policy->constraints,
> policy->min_freq_req, FREQ_QOS_MIN,
> - FREQ_QOS_MIN_DEFAULT_VALUE);
> + init_min_freq);
> if (ret < 0) {
> /*
> * So we don't call freq_qos_remove_request() for an
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index e0e19d9c1323..b20488b55f6c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -414,6 +414,12 @@ struct cpufreq_driver {
> * policy is properly initialized, but before the governor is started.
> */
> void (*register_em)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
> +
> + /*
> + * Set by drivers that want to initialize the policy->min_freq_req with
> + * a value different from the default value (0) in cpufreq core.
> + */
> + int (*get_init_min_freq)(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
> };
>
> /* flags */
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-04 6:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-03 8:39 [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Set initial min_freq to lowest_nonlinear_freq Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-10-03 8:39 ` [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: Add a callback to update the min_freq_req from drivers Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-10-04 6:41 ` Gautham R. Shenoy [this message]
2024-10-04 18:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-10-07 4:40 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-10-07 15:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-10-07 15:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-10-08 6:32 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-10-10 17:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-10-10 7:35 ` Viresh Kumar
2024-10-10 9:54 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-10-10 10:07 ` Viresh Kumar
2024-10-03 8:39 ` [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Set the initial min_freq to lowest_nonlinear_freq Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-10-04 8:47 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-10-03 8:39 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Cleanup the old min_freq qos request remnants Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-10-03 19:23 ` [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Set initial min_freq to lowest_nonlinear_freq Mario Limonciello
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zv+OLnexTcFFXDiY@BLRRASHENOY1.amd.com \
--to=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox