From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Allow AVIC's IPI virtualization to be optional
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 02:29:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZvE06wB0JGWXGxpK@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e5218efaceec20920166bd907416d6f88905558d.camel@redhat.com>
On Tue, Sep 10, 2024, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-10-04 at 16:14 +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > У пн, 2023-10-02 у 12:21 -0700, Sean Christopherson пише:
> > > On Mon, Oct 02, 2023, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > This patch allows AVIC's ICR emulation to be optional and thus allows
> > > > to workaround AVIC's errata #1235 by disabling this portion of the feature.
> > > >
> > > > This is v3 of my patch series 'AVIC bugfixes and workarounds' including
> > > > review feedback.
> > >
> > > Please respond to my idea[*] instead of sending more patches.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > For the v2 of the patch I was already on the fence if to do it this way or to refactor
> > the code, and back when I posted it, I decided still to avoid the refactoring.
> >
> > However, your idea of rewriting this patch, while it does change less lines of code,
> > is even less obvious and consequently required you to write even longer comment to
> > justify it which is not a good sign.
> >
> > In particular I don't want someone to find out later, and in the hard way that sometimes
> > real physid table is accessed, and sometimes a fake copy of it is.
> >
> > So I decided to fix the root cause by not reading the physid table back,
> > which made the code cleaner, and even with the workaround the code
> > IMHO is still simpler than it was before.
> >
> > About the added 'vcpu->loaded' variable, I added it also because it is something that is
> > long overdue to be added, I remember that in IPIv code there was also a need for this,
> > and probalby more places in KVM can be refactored to take advantage of it,
> > instead of various hacks.
> >
> > I did adopt your idea of using 'enable_ipiv', although I am still not 100% sure that this
> > is more readable than 'avic_zen2_workaround'.
>
> Hi!
>
> Sean, can you take another look at this patch series?
Ya, it might take a week or two, but it's on my todo list.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-23 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-02 11:57 [PATCH v3 0/4] Allow AVIC's IPI virtualization to be optional Maxim Levitsky
2023-10-02 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] KVM: Add per vCPU flag specifying that a vCPU is loaded Maxim Levitsky
2023-10-02 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] x86: KVM: AVIC: stop using 'is_running' bit in avic_vcpu_put() Maxim Levitsky
2023-10-02 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] x86: KVM: don't read physical ID table entry in avic_pi_update_irte() Maxim Levitsky
2023-10-02 11:57 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] x86: KVM: SVM: allow optionally to disable AVIC's IPI virtualization Maxim Levitsky
2023-10-02 19:21 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Allow AVIC's IPI virtualization to be optional Sean Christopherson
2023-10-04 13:14 ` Maxim Levitsky
2024-09-10 20:13 ` Maxim Levitsky
2024-09-23 9:29 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-09-23 16:23 ` Maxim Levitsky
2024-10-22 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-10-22 19:00 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-11-22 3:34 ` Maxim Levitsky
2024-11-26 0:25 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZvE06wB0JGWXGxpK@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox