From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Cc: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>,
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>,
Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] perf stat: Add --exclude-guest option
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 13:21:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZvMfVe1VXwhCIOB9@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c26e646d-5ebf-473e-91e2-db28fc01e35d@linaro.org>
Hello,
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 09:47:17AM +0100, James Clark wrote:
>
>
> On 06/09/2024 3:33 pm, Liang, Kan wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2024-09-05 4:24 p.m., Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > This option is to support the old behavior of setting exclude_guest by
> > > default. Now it doesn't set the bit so users want the old behavior can
> > > use this option.
> > >
> > > $ perf stat true
> > >
> > > Performance counter stats for 'true':
> > >
> > > 0.86 msec task-clock:u # 0.443 CPUs utilized
> > > 0 context-switches:u # 0.000 /sec
> > > 0 cpu-migrations:u # 0.000 /sec
> > > 49 page-faults:u # 56.889 K/sec
> > > ...
> > >
> > > $ perf stat --exclude-guest true
> > >
> > > Performance counter stats for 'true':
> > >
> > > 0.79 msec task-clock:Hu # 0.490 CPUs utilized
> > > 0 context-switches:Hu # 0.000 /sec
> > > 0 cpu-migrations:Hu # 0.000 /sec
> > > 49 page-faults:Hu # 62.078 K/sec
> > > ...
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > > tools/perf/Documentation/perf-stat.txt | 7 +++++++
> > > tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 2 ++
> > > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-stat.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-stat.txt
> > > index 2bc06367248691dd..d28d8370a856598f 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-stat.txt
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-stat.txt
> > > @@ -382,6 +382,13 @@ color the metric's computed value.
> > > Don't print output, warnings or messages. This is useful with perf stat
> > > record below to only write data to the perf.data file.
> > > +--exclude-guest::
> > > +Don't count event in the guest mode. It was the old behavior but the
> > > +default is changed to count guest events also. Use this option if you
> > > +want the old behavior (host only). Note that this option needs to be
> > > +before other events in case you added -e/--event option in the command
> > > +line.
> >
> > I'm not sure if we really need this option. I think it may bring more
> > trouble than what we get.
> >
> > The name of the "--exclude-guest" sounds like a replacement of the event
> > modifier "H". But in fact, it's not. It should only affect the default.
> > It doesn't set the "H" for any events.
Well I think it's tricky but it'd set "H" modifier events after the
option. But I have to agree that it can bring more troubles.
> >
> > Except for the perf kvm user, I don't think there are many users which
> > care the exclude_guest. The behavior of the perf kvm is not changed. So
> > the option seems not that important. If we really want an option to
> > restore the old behavior, it's better to choose a better name and update
> > the description.
Personally I don't want to this option but just worried if there's a
case where exclude_guest is preferred.
>
> Do we not want to keep exclude_guest for record, but remove it for stat?
What I really want is to synchronize record and stat behavior in terms
of the default exclusion mode. If everyone is fine, I'd like to remove
exclude_guest from the default and set it only if needed (through the
fallback) like we do for exclude_kernel.
>
> Because in record the addresses of guest samples don't make sense without
> extra work, but for stat you might want to see an overview of the whole
> system.
I think it depends on the use case and (power) users should know about
their environment and requirement. The concern is what's the reasonable
default, but I think it should be the same both in perf record and stat
at least.
>
> For Coresight tracing and SPE we would want to keep exclude_guest, otherwise
> you generate a load of extra trace that you can't make use of. Say you were
> doing PGO on your host you wouldn't be recompiling anything the guests were
> running.
For the specific use case, I think we can guide users to add "H"
modifier (I guess it's not the default event for perf record).
Maybe we can consider per-PMU default attributes.
>
> If we do change the defaults isn't ':H' already enough to go back to the old
> behavior? I'm wondering why we need an argument when all the other exclude
> rules are done with the letter modifiers?
I'm not sure I follow this. But maybe we don't need this option at all.
We can add ":H" for every event but I'm too lazy to add them to all the
default events in perf data. :)
Thanks,
Namhyung
> > > +
> > > STAT RECORD
> > > -----------
> > > Stores stat data into perf data file.
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> > > index d8315dae930184ba..4d47675af5cc3094 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
> > > @@ -2491,6 +2491,8 @@ int cmd_stat(int argc, const char **argv)
> > > OPT_BOOLEAN_FLAG(0, "all-user", &stat_config.all_user,
> > > "Configure all used events to run in user space.",
> > > PARSE_OPT_EXCLUSIVE),
> > > + OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "exclude-guest", &exclude_HG_default,
> > > + "Don't count events in the guest mode"),
> > > OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "percore-show-thread", &stat_config.percore_show_thread,
> > > "Use with 'percore' event qualifier to show the event "
> > > "counts of one hardware thread by sum up total hardware "
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-24 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-05 20:24 [RFC/PATCHSET 00/10] perf tools: Do not set attr.exclude_guest by default (v3) Namhyung Kim
2024-09-05 20:24 ` [PATCH 01/10] perf tools: Add fallback for exclude_guest Namhyung Kim
2024-09-06 13:47 ` Liang, Kan
2024-09-30 20:36 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-09-05 20:24 ` [PATCH 02/10] perf tools: Don't set attr.exclude_guest by default Namhyung Kim
2024-09-06 14:10 ` Liang, Kan
2024-09-05 20:24 ` [PATCH 03/10] perf tools: Simplify evsel__add_modifier() Namhyung Kim
2024-09-05 20:24 ` [PATCH 04/10] perf stat: Add --exclude-guest option Namhyung Kim
2024-09-06 14:33 ` Liang, Kan
2024-09-23 8:47 ` James Clark
2024-09-24 20:21 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2024-09-25 8:36 ` James Clark
2024-09-30 20:13 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-09-25 13:49 ` Liang, Kan
2024-09-30 20:07 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-09-05 20:24 ` [PATCH 05/10] perf tools: Do not set exclude_guest for precise_ip Namhyung Kim
2024-09-05 20:24 ` [PATCH 06/10] perf tools: Detect missing kernel features properly Namhyung Kim
2024-09-05 20:24 ` [PATCH 07/10] perf tools: Separate exclude_hv fallback Namhyung Kim
2024-09-06 15:21 ` Liang, Kan
2024-09-30 20:37 ` Namhyung Kim
2024-09-05 20:24 ` [PATCH 08/10] perf tools: Move x86__is_amd_cpu() to util/env.c Namhyung Kim
2024-09-05 20:24 ` [PATCH 09/10] perf tools: Check fallback error and order Namhyung Kim
2024-09-05 20:24 ` [PATCH 10/10] perf record: Just use "cycles:P" as the default event Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZvMfVe1VXwhCIOB9@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mizhang@google.com \
--cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox