From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@linux.dev>
Cc: void@manifault.com, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
kernel-team@meta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sched-ext@meta.com, Daniel Hodges <hodges.daniel.scott@gmail.com>,
Changwoo Min <multics69@gmail.com>,
Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched_ext, scx_qmap: Add and use SCX_ENQ_CPU_SELECTED
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 06:52:05 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zvg0NarLiSoguzCA@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZvgC6rhPCxXYTrh6@gpd3>
Hello,
On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 03:21:46PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
...
> > sched core has been udpated to specify ENQUEUE_RQ_SELECTED if
> > ->select_task_rq() was called. Map it to SCX_ENQ_CPU_SELECTED and update
> > scx_qmap to test it instead of SCX_ENQ_WAKEUP.
>
> Even if it's quite convenient to have the SCX_ENQ_CPU_SELECTED flag
> provided by kernel, I was wondering if we could just delegate this whole
> logic to BPF and avoid introducing this extra flag in the kernel.
>
> In theory we could track when ops.select_cpu() is called by setting a
> flag in the BPF task context (BPF_MAP_TYPE_TASK_STORAGE). Specifically,
> the flag could be set in ops.select_cpu() and cleared in ops.stopping().
> Then, when ops.enqueue() is called, we can check the flag to determine
> whether ops.select_cpu() was skipped or not.
>
> Since most of the scx schedulers already implement their own task
> context, this shouldn't add too much complexity/overhead to the BPF
> code, it'd be fully backward-compatible and it doesn't depend on the
> particular kernel logic that calls ->select_task_rq(). WDYT?
Yeah, that would work too and probably what we should do to work around on
older kernels, but also it's a relatively obvious hole in the API and we
don't lose anything by updating the kernel to indicate the state.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-28 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-27 23:46 [PATCHSET sched/urgent, sched_ext/for-6.12-fixes] sched/core, sched_ext: Add ENQUEUE_RQ_SELECTED to fix ->select_task_rq() skip detection in sched_ext schedulers Tejun Heo
2024-09-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched/core: Make select_task_rq() take the pointer to wake_flags instead of value Tejun Heo
2024-09-28 0:38 ` David Vernet
2024-09-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 2/3] sched/core: Add ENQUEUE_RQ_SELECTED to indicate whether ->select_task_rq() was called Tejun Heo
2024-09-28 0:38 ` David Vernet
2024-10-01 20:12 ` Tejun Heo
2024-10-04 20:14 ` Tejun Heo
2024-10-05 9:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-07 16:44 ` Tejun Heo
2024-09-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] sched_ext, scx_qmap: Add and use SCX_ENQ_CPU_SELECTED Tejun Heo
2024-09-28 0:39 ` David Vernet
2024-09-28 13:21 ` Andrea Righi
2024-09-28 16:52 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2024-10-07 20:20 ` [PATCHSET sched/urgent, sched_ext/for-6.12-fixes] sched/core, sched_ext: Add ENQUEUE_RQ_SELECTED to fix ->select_task_rq() skip detection in sched_ext schedulers Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zvg0NarLiSoguzCA@slm.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=andrea.righi@linux.dev \
--cc=hodges.daniel.scott@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=multics69@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=schatzberg.dan@gmail.com \
--cc=sched-ext@meta.com \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox