public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
	eranian@google.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
	irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
	kan.liang@linux.intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, bp@alien8.de,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	santosh.shukla@amd.com, ananth.narayan@amd.com,
	sandipan.das@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] perf/amd/ibs: Add ->check_period() callback
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 12:33:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZwQ3iEx5dBzVXZEl@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241007034810.754-8-ravi.bangoria@amd.com>

On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 03:48:09AM +0000, Ravi Bangoria wrote:
> IBS Fetch and IBS Op pmus have constraints on sample period. The sample
> period is verified at the time of opening an event but not at the ioctl()
> interface. Hence, a user can open an event with valid period but change
> it later with ioctl(). Add a ->check_period() callback to verify the
> period provided at ioctl() is also valid.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/events/amd/ibs.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/amd/ibs.c b/arch/x86/events/amd/ibs.c
> index e7522ba45a7e..33728ed6d7a6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/amd/ibs.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/amd/ibs.c
> @@ -551,6 +551,28 @@ static void perf_ibs_del(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
>  
>  static void perf_ibs_read(struct perf_event *event) { }
>  
> +static int perf_ibs_check_period(struct perf_event *event, u64 value)
> +{
> +	struct perf_ibs *perf_ibs;
> +	u64 low_nibble;
> +
> +	if (event->attr.freq)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	perf_ibs = container_of(event->pmu, struct perf_ibs, pmu);
> +	low_nibble = value & 0xFULL;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * This contradicts with perf_ibs_init() which allows sample period
> +	 * with lower nibble bits set but silently masks them off. Whereas
> +	 * this returns error.
> +	 */
> +	if (low_nibble || value < perf_ibs->min_period)
> +		return -EINVAL;

You may want to check max_period too.

Thanks,
Namhyung

> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * We need to initialize with empty group if all attributes in the
>   * group are dynamic.
> @@ -676,6 +698,7 @@ static struct perf_ibs perf_ibs_fetch = {
>  		.start		= perf_ibs_start,
>  		.stop		= perf_ibs_stop,
>  		.read		= perf_ibs_read,
> +		.check_period	= perf_ibs_check_period,
>  		.capabilities	= PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE,
>  	},
>  	.msr			= MSR_AMD64_IBSFETCHCTL,
> @@ -701,6 +724,7 @@ static struct perf_ibs perf_ibs_op = {
>  		.start		= perf_ibs_start,
>  		.stop		= perf_ibs_stop,
>  		.read		= perf_ibs_read,
> +		.check_period	= perf_ibs_check_period,
>  		.capabilities	= PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE,
>  	},
>  	.msr			= MSR_AMD64_IBSOPCTL,
> -- 
> 2.46.2
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-07 19:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-07  3:48 [PATCH 0/8] perf/amd/ibs: Fix sample period computations Ravi Bangoria
2024-10-07  3:48 ` [PATCH 1/8] perf/amd/ibs: Remove IBS_{FETCH|OP}_CONFIG_MASK macros Ravi Bangoria
2024-10-07  3:48 ` [PATCH 2/8] perf/amd/ibs: Remove pointless sample period check Ravi Bangoria
2024-10-07 19:16   ` Namhyung Kim
2024-10-07  3:48 ` [PATCH 3/8] perf/amd/ibs: Fix ->config to sample period calculation for OP pmu Ravi Bangoria
2024-10-07  3:48 ` [PATCH 4/8] perf/amd/ibs: Fix perf_ibs_op.cnt_mask for CurCnt Ravi Bangoria
2024-10-07  3:48 ` [PATCH 5/8] perf/amd/ibs: Don't allow freq mode event creation through ->config interface Ravi Bangoria
2024-10-07 19:24   ` Namhyung Kim
2024-10-08  5:30     ` Ravi Bangoria
2024-10-09  6:27       ` Namhyung Kim
2024-10-07  3:48 ` [PATCH 6/8] perf/amd/ibs: Add pmu specific minimum period Ravi Bangoria
2024-10-07 19:30   ` Namhyung Kim
2024-10-08  5:46     ` Ravi Bangoria
2024-10-09  6:32       ` Namhyung Kim
2024-10-07  3:48 ` [PATCH 7/8] perf/amd/ibs: Add ->check_period() callback Ravi Bangoria
2024-10-07 19:33   ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2024-10-07  3:48 ` [PATCH 8/8] perf/core: Introduce pmu->adjust_period() callback Ravi Bangoria
2024-10-09  6:33 ` [PATCH 0/8] perf/amd/ibs: Fix sample period computations Namhyung Kim
2024-11-19 13:35   ` Ravi Bangoria

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZwQ3iEx5dBzVXZEl@google.com \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ananth.narayan@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
    --cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
    --cc=santosh.shukla@amd.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox