From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] KVM: x86: Fix and harden reg caching from !TASK context
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 09:17:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zwf-EX_JVfAGmrPj@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dade78b3-81b1-45fb-8833-479f508313ac@redhat.com>
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 10/9/24 19:49, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Fix a (VMX only) bug reported by Maxim where KVM caches a stale SS.AR_BYTES
> > when involuntary preemption schedules out a vCPU during vmx_vcpu_rest(), and
> > ultimately clobbers the VMCS's SS.AR_BYTES if userspace does KVM_GET_SREGS
> > => KVM_SET_SREGS, i.e. if userspace writes the stale value back into KVM.
> >
> > v4, as this is a spiritual successor to Maxim's earlier series.
> >
> > Patch 1 fixes the underlying problem by avoiding the cache in kvm_sched_out().
>
> I think we want this one in stable?
If anything, we should send Maxim's patch to stable trees. While not a complete
fix, it resolves the only known scenario where caching SS.AR_BYTES is truly
problematic, it's as low risk as patches get, and it's much more likely to backport
cleanly to older kernels.
> > Patch 2 fixes vmx_vcpu_reset() to invalidate the cache _after_ writing the
> > VMCS, which also fixes the VMCS clobbering bug, but isn't as robust of a fix
> > for KVM as a whole, e.g. any other flow that invalidates the cache too "early"
> > would be susceptible to the bug, and on its own doesn't allow for the
> > hardening in patch 3.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-10 16:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-09 17:49 [PATCH v4 0/4] KVM: x86: Fix and harden reg caching from !TASK context Sean Christopherson
2024-10-09 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] KVM: x86: Bypass register cache when querying CPL from kvm_sched_out() Sean Christopherson
2024-10-30 21:11 ` Maxim Levitsky
2024-10-09 17:50 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] KVM: VMX: reset the segment cache after segment init in vmx_vcpu_reset() Sean Christopherson
2024-10-09 17:50 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] KVM: x86: Add lockdep-guarded asserts on register cache usage Sean Christopherson
2024-10-30 21:13 ` Maxim Levitsky
2024-10-09 17:50 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] KVM: x86: Use '0' for guest RIP if PMI encounters protected guest state Sean Christopherson
2024-10-30 21:13 ` Maxim Levitsky
2024-10-10 13:06 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] KVM: x86: Fix and harden reg caching from !TASK context Paolo Bonzini
2024-10-10 16:17 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-10-10 16:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-10-31 19:51 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-11-01 19:28 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zwf-EX_JVfAGmrPj@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox