Re: linus-next: improving functional testing for to-be-merged pull requests

Guenter Roeck
2024-10-24T05:16:34Z

On 10/23/24 22:01, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 14:59:16 +1100
> Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
>
>>> But pushing to linux-next for a day or two, what does that give me?
>>
>> Several thousand build tests, across pretty much every architecture.
>>
>> And a few hundred boot tests, lots virtualised, but some on real HW.
>>
>> A single character typo in an #ifdef your testing doesn't cover can
>> break the build for lots of people ...
>
> I use to get that from the zero-day bot from intel. Does that not run
> anymore? I noticed that I don't get notifications anymore.
>

I do get notifications, so it is still running.
Its configuration is (still) at https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git,
so you can check yourself if your current repositories and branches are
listed (and send a pull request to update it if needed). I see

repo/linux/rostedt-kconfig:owner: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
repo/linux/rostedt-ktest:owner: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
repo/linux/rostedt-trace:owner: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

so at least some testing should still happen. I did notice though
that "notify_build_success_branch:" is only set in one of the files,
so you might not get notified if a build was successful in the other
two.

Guenter