From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC482212168; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 14:02:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729864932; cv=none; b=SznTjFjikCbOvNGQJe+/08mSBa22HNj6/sY9KMlno9pIHPSftRsu+1k17noc6A4m6NxJ9/kthCo6uQpnMVDi2T28r5CyqEGTJASfiCrxxGkCkmFfMzn7FzkCP5I2CGyZnQKIDhpqUy50zRMDciU6kYh4Cj9hqIPf3lWOfBCmOQ0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729864932; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uOUytvJeyy3SqYRpdRsBWf13Adk6SJC8Eee84d3Etug=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=fZKjaC9WnWegxuITYYWKQtj+dDiQVT5dL10ZPIj02DM3c8vZ8cEyzeAvfWhRvE/+z7sdrZvW8RBFcm3VbDFUYQtY4RxNbx/YaVfx89o5Hosc0nOQ9gWHAZu1x2uwX0DgKM3TU8nud9TqPjhe5isBgiqSa/2nvnMGiYaEXimehvg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=SRBx6Rbx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="SRBx6Rbx" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 69293C4CEC3; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 14:02:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1729864931; bh=uOUytvJeyy3SqYRpdRsBWf13Adk6SJC8Eee84d3Etug=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=SRBx6RbxR5nuw+gDjyclmxQ45SMY1Z/wdsODDoBv6EDDt+cfCE0A8C09z77A44GsG Fl3YD9mvL1lKw75XRpaHg4GDOFkWuf0rDOOA25f/rDWFltcJup7FlMmxYPb1fe1l36 9pKZsLZAeWLDgbjbtmwylseIT/ExTOBC6HhCqjcHtxPdZtRxeRzK7tIY9veBhxdNrz J3KfUdiFeCmCbu+Jzx+XX8M5fGkJ/hlWtA7Py7Hv6ozszRWqhEpSBRNSl3ahtscPrX CUGmopX0JoU2qGKy31gd2JdOD+mQapW8KxNxUfdoP/9XSVC+rwwhSm/v+d0/Oo3SFO qF2//B8TjtyLw== Received: from johan by xi.lan with local (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1t4Kta-000000005yi-0WFi; Fri, 25 Oct 2024 16:02:30 +0200 Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 16:02:30 +0200 From: Johan Hovold To: Sibi Sankar Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, jassisinghbrar@gmail.com, dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, konradybcio@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, tstrudel@google.com, rafael@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/4] firmware: arm_scmi: Misc Fixes Message-ID: References: <20241023102148.1698910-1-quic_sibis@quicinc.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241023102148.1698910-1-quic_sibis@quicinc.com> On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 03:51:44PM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote: > The series addresses the kernel warnings reported by Johan at [1] and are > are required to X1E cpufreq device tree changes [2] to land. > > [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZoQjAWse2YxwyRJv@hovoldconsulting.com/ > [2] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240612124056.39230-1-quic_sibis@quicinc.com/ > > The following warnings remain unadressed: > arm-scmi arm-scmi.0.auto: Failed to add opps_by_lvl at 3417600 for NCC - ret:-16 > arm-scmi arm-scmi.0.auto: Failed to add opps_by_lvl at 3417600 for NCC - ret:-16 > > They indicate that duplicate opps are reported by the SCP firmware and > they are seen during probe. They will get addressed by firmware updates. > > Duplicate levels: > arm-scmi arm-scmi.0.auto: Level 2976000 Power 218062 Latency 30us Ifreq 2976000 Index 10 > arm-scmi arm-scmi.0.auto: Level 3206400 Power 264356 Latency 30us Ifreq 3206400 Index 11 > arm-scmi arm-scmi.0.auto: Level 3417600 Power 314966 Latency 30us Ifreq 3417600 Index 12 > arm-scmi arm-scmi.0.auto: Failed to add opps_by_lvl at 3417600 for NCC - ret:-16 > arm-scmi arm-scmi.0.auto: Failed to add opps_by_lvl at 3417600 for NCC - ret:-16 > arm-scmi arm-scmi.0.auto: Level 4012800 Power 528848 Latency 30us Ifreq 4012800 Index 15 > > ^^ exist because SCP reports duplicate values for the highest sustainable > freq for perf domains 1 and 2. These are the only freqs that appear as > duplicates and will be fixed with a firmware update. FWIW the warnings > that we are addressing in this series will also get fixed by a firmware > update but they still have to land for devices already out in the wild. Thanks for sorting this out, Sibi! I guess the above description is clear enough too as to why the opps_by_lvl warnings should stay (in some form). Johan