public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2 bpf 1/2] bpf: Fix out-of-bounds write in trie_get_next_key()
@ 2024-10-26  5:02 Byeonguk Jeong
  2024-10-26  5:04 ` [PATCH v2 bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for trie_get_next_key() Byeonguk Jeong
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Byeonguk Jeong @ 2024-10-26  5:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen, Alexei Starovoitov,
	Daniel Borkmann, Hou Tao, Yonghong Song
  Cc: linux-kernel, bpf

trie_get_next_key() allocates a node stack with size trie->max_prefixlen,
while it writes (trie->max_prefixlen + 1) nodes to the stack when it has
full paths from the root to leaves. For example, consider a trie with
max_prefixlen is 8, and the nodes with key 0x00/0, 0x00/1, 0x00/2, ...
0x00/8 inserted. Subsequent calls to trie_get_next_key with _key with
.prefixlen = 8 make 9 nodes be written on the node stack with size 8.

Fixes: b471f2f1de8b ("bpf: implement MAP_GET_NEXT_KEY command for LPM_TRIE map")
Signed-off-by: Byeonguk Jeong <jungbu2855@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
---
v1 -> v2: nothing changed
---
 kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c b/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
index 0218a5132ab5..9b60eda0f727 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c
@@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ static int trie_get_next_key(struct bpf_map *map, void *_key, void *_next_key)
 	if (!key || key->prefixlen > trie->max_prefixlen)
 		goto find_leftmost;
 
-	node_stack = kmalloc_array(trie->max_prefixlen,
+	node_stack = kmalloc_array(trie->max_prefixlen + 1,
 				   sizeof(struct lpm_trie_node *),
 				   GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN);
 	if (!node_stack)
-- 
2.43.5


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for trie_get_next_key()
  2024-10-26  5:02 [PATCH v2 bpf 1/2] bpf: Fix out-of-bounds write in trie_get_next_key() Byeonguk Jeong
@ 2024-10-26  5:04 ` Byeonguk Jeong
  2024-10-29  1:33   ` Hou Tao
  2024-10-29  1:32 ` [PATCH v2 bpf 1/2] bpf: Fix out-of-bounds write in trie_get_next_key() Hou Tao
  2024-10-29 20:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Byeonguk Jeong @ 2024-10-26  5:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen, Alexei Starovoitov,
	Daniel Borkmann, Hou Tao, Yonghong Song
  Cc: linux-kernel, bpf

Add a test for out-of-bounds write in trie_get_next_key() when a full
path from root to leaf exists and bpf_map_get_next_key() is called
with the leaf node. It may crashes the kernel on failure, so please
run in a VM.

Signed-off-by: Byeonguk Jeong <jungbu2855@gmail.com>
---
v1 -> v2:
  - Fixed a build error.
  - Removed unnecessary comments about crash-on-failure warning.
  - Fix a variable to be initialized before using it.
---
 .../bpf/map_tests/lpm_trie_map_get_next_key.c | 109 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 109 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/lpm_trie_map_get_next_key.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/lpm_trie_map_get_next_key.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/lpm_trie_map_get_next_key.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..0ba015686492
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/lpm_trie_map_get_next_key.c
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#define _GNU_SOURCE
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdbool.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <pthread.h>
+
+#include <bpf/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/libbpf.h>
+
+#include <test_maps.h>
+
+struct test_lpm_key {
+	__u32 prefix;
+	__u32 data;
+};
+
+struct get_next_key_ctx {
+	struct test_lpm_key key;
+	bool start;
+	bool stop;
+	int map_fd;
+	int loop;
+};
+
+static void *get_next_key_fn(void *arg)
+{
+	struct get_next_key_ctx *ctx = arg;
+	struct test_lpm_key next_key;
+	int i = 0;
+
+	while (!ctx->start)
+		usleep(1);
+
+	while (!ctx->stop && i++ < ctx->loop)
+		bpf_map_get_next_key(ctx->map_fd, &ctx->key, &next_key);
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static void abort_get_next_key(struct get_next_key_ctx *ctx, pthread_t *tids,
+			       unsigned int nr)
+{
+	unsigned int i;
+
+	ctx->stop = true;
+	ctx->start = true;
+	for (i = 0; i < nr; i++)
+		pthread_join(tids[i], NULL);
+}
+
+/* This test aims to prevent regression of future. As long as the kernel does
+ * not panic, it is considered as success.
+ */
+void test_lpm_trie_map_get_next_key(void)
+{
+#define MAX_NR_THREADS 8
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_map_create_opts, create_opts,
+		    .map_flags = BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC);
+	struct test_lpm_key key = {};
+	__u32 val = 0;
+	int map_fd;
+	const __u32 max_prefixlen = 8 * (sizeof(key) - sizeof(key.prefix));
+	const __u32 max_entries = max_prefixlen + 1;
+	unsigned int i, nr = MAX_NR_THREADS, loop = 65536;
+	pthread_t tids[MAX_NR_THREADS];
+	struct get_next_key_ctx ctx;
+	int err;
+
+	map_fd = bpf_map_create(BPF_MAP_TYPE_LPM_TRIE, "lpm_trie_map",
+				sizeof(struct test_lpm_key), sizeof(__u32),
+				max_entries, &create_opts);
+	CHECK(map_fd == -1, "bpf_map_create()", "error:%s\n",
+	      strerror(errno));
+
+	for (i = 0; i <= max_prefixlen; i++) {
+		key.prefix = i;
+		err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &key, &val, BPF_ANY);
+		CHECK(err, "bpf_map_update_elem()", "error:%s\n",
+		      strerror(errno));
+	}
+
+	ctx.start = false;
+	ctx.stop = false;
+	ctx.map_fd = map_fd;
+	ctx.loop = loop;
+	memcpy(&ctx.key, &key, sizeof(key));
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
+		err = pthread_create(&tids[i], NULL, get_next_key_fn, &ctx);
+		if (err) {
+			abort_get_next_key(&ctx, tids, i);
+			CHECK(err, "pthread_create", "error %d\n", err);
+		}
+	}
+
+	ctx.start = true;
+	for (i = 0; i < nr; i++)
+		pthread_join(tids[i], NULL);
+
+	printf("%s:PASS\n", __func__);
+
+	close(map_fd);
+}
-- 
2.43.5


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 bpf 1/2] bpf: Fix out-of-bounds write in trie_get_next_key()
  2024-10-26  5:02 [PATCH v2 bpf 1/2] bpf: Fix out-of-bounds write in trie_get_next_key() Byeonguk Jeong
  2024-10-26  5:04 ` [PATCH v2 bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for trie_get_next_key() Byeonguk Jeong
@ 2024-10-29  1:32 ` Hou Tao
  2024-10-29 20:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hou Tao @ 2024-10-29  1:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Byeonguk Jeong, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen,
	Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Yonghong Song
  Cc: linux-kernel, bpf



On 10/26/2024 1:02 PM, Byeonguk Jeong wrote:
> trie_get_next_key() allocates a node stack with size trie->max_prefixlen,
> while it writes (trie->max_prefixlen + 1) nodes to the stack when it has
> full paths from the root to leaves. For example, consider a trie with
> max_prefixlen is 8, and the nodes with key 0x00/0, 0x00/1, 0x00/2, ...
> 0x00/8 inserted. Subsequent calls to trie_get_next_key with _key with
> .prefixlen = 8 make 9 nodes be written on the node stack with size 8.
>
> Fixes: b471f2f1de8b ("bpf: implement MAP_GET_NEXT_KEY command for LPM_TRIE map")
> Signed-off-by: Byeonguk Jeong <jungbu2855@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@kernel.org>
> Tested-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
> ---

Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for trie_get_next_key()
  2024-10-26  5:04 ` [PATCH v2 bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for trie_get_next_key() Byeonguk Jeong
@ 2024-10-29  1:33   ` Hou Tao
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hou Tao @ 2024-10-29  1:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Byeonguk Jeong, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen,
	Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Yonghong Song
  Cc: linux-kernel, bpf



On 10/26/2024 1:04 PM, Byeonguk Jeong wrote:
> Add a test for out-of-bounds write in trie_get_next_key() when a full
> path from root to leaf exists and bpf_map_get_next_key() is called
> with the leaf node. It may crashes the kernel on failure, so please
> run in a VM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Byeonguk Jeong <jungbu2855@gmail.com>
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
>   - Fixed a build error.
>   - Removed unnecessary comments about crash-on-failure warning.
>   - Fix a variable to be initialized before using it.
> ---

Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 bpf 1/2] bpf: Fix out-of-bounds write in trie_get_next_key()
  2024-10-26  5:02 [PATCH v2 bpf 1/2] bpf: Fix out-of-bounds write in trie_get_next_key() Byeonguk Jeong
  2024-10-26  5:04 ` [PATCH v2 bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for trie_get_next_key() Byeonguk Jeong
  2024-10-29  1:32 ` [PATCH v2 bpf 1/2] bpf: Fix out-of-bounds write in trie_get_next_key() Hou Tao
@ 2024-10-29 20:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2024-10-29 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Byeonguk Jeong
  Cc: toke, ast, daniel, houtao, yonghong.song, linux-kernel, bpf

Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:

On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 14:02:43 +0900 you wrote:
> trie_get_next_key() allocates a node stack with size trie->max_prefixlen,
> while it writes (trie->max_prefixlen + 1) nodes to the stack when it has
> full paths from the root to leaves. For example, consider a trie with
> max_prefixlen is 8, and the nodes with key 0x00/0, 0x00/1, 0x00/2, ...
> 0x00/8 inserted. Subsequent calls to trie_get_next_key with _key with
> .prefixlen = 8 make 9 nodes be written on the node stack with size 8.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v2,bpf,1/2] bpf: Fix out-of-bounds write in trie_get_next_key()
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/13400ac8fb80
  - [v2,bpf,2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for trie_get_next_key()
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/d7f214aeacb9

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-10-29 20:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-10-26  5:02 [PATCH v2 bpf 1/2] bpf: Fix out-of-bounds write in trie_get_next_key() Byeonguk Jeong
2024-10-26  5:04 ` [PATCH v2 bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for trie_get_next_key() Byeonguk Jeong
2024-10-29  1:33   ` Hou Tao
2024-10-29  1:32 ` [PATCH v2 bpf 1/2] bpf: Fix out-of-bounds write in trie_get_next_key() Hou Tao
2024-10-29 20:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox