From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.8bytes.org (mail.8bytes.org [85.214.250.239]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 370362064FE for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 12:03:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=85.214.250.239 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730203426; cv=none; b=txyOM/z2xuadwgUO5MajkYt5rfsv6xY6H52G03rUPMHHQOCM3dH+J5zK+Jvr9IigItqaj4fNNJ+KeIXyqZse9iDxQ+NFvZZpghX0HNiVblJLHNPFVjn5qmv7MdFwGoSRTX+DFe54kfrvbrCPz6s5tp2hB3t2JhadVazbQ/lVcRE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730203426; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0arwWO/z8nwgluKfMG97O4YJP87Fp6inA4j+237I7LY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=jsQkfNoBkb5AmXc//ZxfngvALwr2pYQwtOD7NorI3eSl6dvyvDj/oR1TpJzNUEpHmGT3GTWXgKhtHkceqYPRESA84kXYGMt5jnROS1U3dmb42x/JvhhKQ6w/AmYRkQh5dvbe/E6KX0EN19fKQXb1fMnS02Ld/W/F8RoBIXokh5E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=8bytes.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=8bytes.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=8bytes.org header.i=@8bytes.org header.b=NKdXUkUk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=85.214.250.239 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=8bytes.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=8bytes.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=8bytes.org header.i=@8bytes.org header.b="NKdXUkUk" Received: from 8bytes.org (p549219d2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.146.25.210]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.8bytes.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 17B542A8D55; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 13:03:43 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=8bytes.org; s=default; t=1730203423; bh=0arwWO/z8nwgluKfMG97O4YJP87Fp6inA4j+237I7LY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=NKdXUkUkYpKnnLaAjd2+/a1o3SgIwl5sMxarCDnHNI1qAoZOJUzsl2xUmee/xv5qs DyyZZU8pV2o3RTGInHikp9Isgzd/TXgqXMcAdKzv9JxsFlgOxMTqrLz/wNY9QI/NfD vIrUG/yIS8pEDPC9PyK7pS3okOq6mPGF84yc4nPCQOsliFMND4eZIGBHOK3FdBd/iJ Rd+V8qK1nuhLMlWRmy9yq5dWDxt2ucI+l5J+b77hWOYhWbnDVoakzeIL68KTlHAvw4 yLCElK4fqQH+lCwfquoruIeTRbO+gvHeZHhLNSiS+5XCEbJD6vp4j2z7OGxek2Ksbm xuyZ7MF+3SniQ== Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 13:03:42 +0100 From: Joerg Roedel To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, Will Deacon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu: Restore iommu_flush_iotlb_all() Message-ID: References: <20241029112302.63639-1-joro@8bytes.org> <20241029114201.GH20281@ziepe.ca> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241029114201.GH20281@ziepe.ca> On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 08:42:01AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > Strange that 0-day didn't flag this in my trees. We really need to get > 0-day running on the iommu list too :\ In general I agree, but these issues where found with allnoconfig/allmodconfig builds. Or in other words, compile tests I expect patch submitters to do before sending changes my way. Regards, Joerg