public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Doug Nelson <doug.nelson@intel.com>,
	bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	mingo@redhat.com, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: Stall on adding/removing wokers into workqueue pool
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 13:42:24 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZyLEYMZP2SiVGeSD@slm.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1cf7b0dbfa4190eeaf0b3401bf7a991b8db59a59.camel@linux.intel.com>

Hello, Tim.

On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 03:03:33PM -0700, Tim Chen wrote:
> Hi Tejun,
> 
> Forwarding this task hung seen by my colleague Doug Nelson. He tested
> the 6.12-rc4 kernel with an OLTP workload running on a 2 socket with
> Granite Rapids CPU that has 86 cores per socket. The traces 
> seem to indicate that the acquisition 
> of wq_pool_attach_mutex stalled in idle_cull_fn() when removing worker from
> the pool. Doug hit this problem occasionally in his tests.
> 
> Searching through the bug reports, there's a similar report by szybot on the
> 6.12-rc2 kernel. Szybot reported similar task hung when attaching workers to
> the pool: https://lore.kernel.org/all/6706c4ba.050a0220.1139e6.0008.GAE@google.com/T/
> So we suspect that the problem is not GNR CPU specific.
> 
> Wonder if this problem is a known one?

First time I see it. The trace doesn't show who's holding the mutex. There
doesn't seem to be any place where that mutex should leak at least on a
glance, so hopefully it shouldn't be too difficult to find who's holding it.
Can you trigger sysrq-d and sysrq-t and post the output?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-30 23:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-29 22:03 BUG: Stall on adding/removing wokers into workqueue pool Tim Chen
2024-10-30 23:42 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2024-11-01 17:37   ` Tim Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZyLEYMZP2SiVGeSD@slm.duckdns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=doug.nelson@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox