public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
	John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch v6 02/20] posix-timers: Make signal overrun accounting sensible
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 13:51:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZyTO7mFZWRZf7sNv@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241031154424.677253735@linutronix.de>

Le Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 04:46:25PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner a écrit :
> The handling of the timer overrun in the signal code is inconsistent as it
> takes previous overruns into account. This is just wrong as after the
> reprogramming of a timer the overrun count starts over from a clean state,
> i.e. 0.
> 
> Don't touch info::si_overrun in send_sigqueue() and only store the overrun
> value at signal delivery time, which is computed from the timer itself
> relative to the expiry time.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
> V6: Fold the timer_overrun_to_int() cleanup from Frederic and remove all
>     overrun fiddling from the signal path.
> ---
>  kernel/signal.c            |    6 ------
>  kernel/time/posix-timers.c |   11 ++++++-----
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> ---
> 
> --- a/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -1968,15 +1968,9 @@ int send_sigqueue(struct sigqueue *q, st
>  
>  	ret = 0;
>  	if (unlikely(!list_empty(&q->list))) {
> -		/*
> -		 * If an SI_TIMER entry is already queue just increment
> -		 * the overrun count.
> -		 */
> -		q->info.si_overrun++;
>  		result = TRACE_SIGNAL_ALREADY_PENDING;
>  		goto out;
>  	}
> -	q->info.si_overrun = 0;

So it's not cleared anymore on signal queue?

Not sure if it's a big problem but if an interval timer gets a signal with
overruns and then the timer is reset later as non interval, the resulting
upcoming signals will still carry the previous non-zero overruns?

However it's better to keep the overrun update on a single place so
perhaps this?

diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
index 66ed49efc02f..f06c52731d65 100644
--- a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
@@ -282,6 +282,8 @@ bool posixtimer_deliver_signal(struct kernel_siginfo *info)
 		++timr->it_signal_seq;
 
 		info->si_overrun = timer_overrun_to_int(timr);
+	} else {
+		info->si_overrun = 0;
 	}
 	ret = true;
 
Other than that:

Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-01 12:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-31 15:46 [patch v6 00/20] posix-timers: Cure the SIG_IGN mess Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 01/20] posix-timers: Make signal delivery consistent Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-01 12:26   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 02/20] posix-timers: Make signal overrun accounting sensible Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-01 12:51   ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2024-11-01 20:36     ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-02 19:41       ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-02 22:57         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 03/20] posix-cpu-timers: Cleanup the firing logic Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-01 13:14   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 04/20] posix-cpu-timers: Use dedicated flag for CPU timer nanosleep Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 05/20] posix-timers: Add a refcount to struct k_itimer Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 06/20] signal: Split up __sigqueue_alloc() Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 07/20] signal: Provide posixtimer_sigqueue_init() Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 08/20] posix-timers: Store PID type in the timer Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 09/20] signal: Refactor send_sigqueue() Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 10/20] signal: Replace resched_timer logic Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-01 13:25   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 11/20] posix-timers: Embed sigqueue in struct k_itimer Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 12/20] signal: Cleanup unused posix-timer leftovers Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 13/20] posix-timers: Move sequence logic into struct k_itimer Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 14/20] signal: Provide ignored_posix_timers list Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 15/20] posix-timers: Handle ignored list on delete and exit Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-01 13:47   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-01 20:38     ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 16/20] signal: Handle ignored signals in do_sigaction(action != SIG_IGN) Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-01 14:04   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 17/20] signal: Queue ignored posixtimers on ignore list Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-01 14:21   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-01 20:47     ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-02 14:49       ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-02 20:57         ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-02 23:46       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-03  9:44         ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-03 19:55           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-02 21:05   ` [patch v6.1 " Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-04 11:42     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-11-04 15:21       ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-04 21:31         ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-11-04 23:02           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 18/20] posix-timers: Cleanup SIG_IGN workaround leftovers Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 19/20] alarmtimers: Remove the throttle mechanism from alarm_forward_now() Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-31 15:46 ` [patch v6 20/20] alarmtimers: Remove return value from alarm functions Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZyTO7mFZWRZf7sNv@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=jstultz@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox