public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>
Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com, cristian.marussi@arm.com,
	ulf.hansson@linaro.org, jassisinghbrar@gmail.com,
	dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, konradybcio@kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, tstrudel@google.com, rafael@kernel.org,
	Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/6] firmware: arm_scmi: Report duplicate opps as firmware bugs
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 15:09:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZyThAFbOHKaBIgLg@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241030125512.2884761-4-quic_sibis@quicinc.com>

On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 06:25:09PM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> Duplicate opps reported by buggy SCP firmware currently show up
> as warnings even though the only functional impact is that the
> level/index remain inaccessible. Make it less scary for the end
> user by using dev_info instead, along with FW_BUG tag.
> 
> Suggested-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
> index 32f9a9acd3e9..c7e5a34b254b 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
> @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ process_response_opp(struct device *dev, struct perf_dom_info *dom,
>  
>  	ret = xa_insert(&dom->opps_by_lvl, opp->perf, opp, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (ret) {
> -		dev_warn(dev, "Failed to add opps_by_lvl at %d for %s - ret:%d\n",
> +		dev_info(dev, FW_BUG "Failed to add opps_by_lvl at %d for %s - ret:%d\n",
>  			 opp->perf, dom->info.name, ret);

I was hoping you could make the error message a bit more informative as
well, for example, by saying that a duplicate opp level was ignored:

	arm-scmi arm-scmi.0.auto: [Firmware Bug]: Ignoring duplicate OPP 3417600 for NCC

or similar (e.g. as the current message looks like an error, with errno
and all, that indeed warrants warning level).

Perhaps with such a message you could even keep the warning level to
make it stand out more (if that's desirable) without the risk of scaring
users.

Johan

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-11-01 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-30 12:55 [PATCH V5 0/6] firmware: arm_scmi: Misc Fixes Sibi Sankar
2024-10-30 12:55 ` [PATCH V5 1/6] firmware: arm_scmi: Ensure that the message-id supports fastchannel Sibi Sankar
2024-10-30 12:55 ` [PATCH V5 2/6] firmware: arm_scmi: Skip opp duplicates Sibi Sankar
2024-10-30 12:55 ` [PATCH V5 3/6] firmware: arm_scmi: Report duplicate opps as firmware bugs Sibi Sankar
2024-10-30 14:39   ` Cristian Marussi
2024-10-30 16:42   ` Florian Fainelli
2024-11-01 14:09   ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2024-11-04 13:50     ` Sibi Sankar
2024-11-04 14:07       ` Cristian Marussi
2024-11-04 14:09       ` Johan Hovold
2024-11-06  7:20         ` Sudeep Holla
2024-11-06  7:07   ` Sudeep Holla
2024-10-30 12:55 ` [PATCH V5 4/6] pmdomain: core: Add GENPD_FLAG_DEV_NAME_FW flag Sibi Sankar
2024-10-30 12:55 ` [PATCH V5 5/6] pmdomain: arm: Use FLAG_DEV_NAME_FW to ensure unique names Sibi Sankar
2024-10-30 12:55 ` [PATCH V5 6/6] mailbox: qcom-cpucp: Mark the irq with IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag Sibi Sankar
2024-10-30 16:19 ` [PATCH V5 0/6] firmware: arm_scmi: Misc Fixes Ulf Hansson
2024-10-30 16:28   ` Cristian Marussi
2024-11-06  7:12     ` Sudeep Holla
2024-11-12 15:56       ` Ulf Hansson
2024-11-12 17:19         ` Johan Hovold
2024-11-12 18:48           ` Ulf Hansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZyThAFbOHKaBIgLg@hovoldconsulting.com \
    --to=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
    --cc=johan+linaro@kernel.org \
    --cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_sibis@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=tstrudel@google.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox