From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dyoung@redhat.com,
daniel.kiper@oracle.com, noodles@fb.com, lijiang@redhat.com,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/mm: rename the confusing local variable in early_memremap_is_setup_data()
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2024 08:23:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZyVxBbGYsEjifLgp@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241101161849.GCZyT_aSMcGIXnGr1-@fat_crate.local>
On 11/01/24 at 05:18pm, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 11:41:12AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > Should I send the fixing patch alone and clean up the useless argument
> > 'size' later, or squash them into one patch?
>
> First the fix, then the cleanup.
Sure, will do. Thanks a lot.
>
> Btw, that fix wants to go to stable no? Seeing how it breaks certain machines
> with IMA and kdump and SMe...
Yeah, it should be added to stable. Distros may get both SME/IMA set not
as early as the bug introduced, while anyone doing so in an earlier kernel
will see the problem.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-02 0:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-11 8:16 [PATCH v3 0/2] x86/mm/sme: fix the kdump kernel breakage on SME system when CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC=y Baoquan He
2024-09-11 8:16 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/mm: rename the confusing local variable in early_memremap_is_setup_data() Baoquan He
2024-10-29 18:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-10-30 0:53 ` Baoquan He
2024-10-30 12:49 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-10-31 3:41 ` Baoquan He
2024-11-01 16:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-11-02 0:23 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2024-11-02 11:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-11-06 11:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-11-07 9:30 ` Baoquan He
2024-11-13 12:55 ` Baoquan He
2024-11-13 13:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-09-11 8:16 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/mm/sme: fix the kdump kernel breakage on SME system when CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC=y Baoquan He
2024-11-13 13:27 ` [tip: x86/urgent] x86/mm: Fix a kdump kernel failure " tip-bot2 for Baoquan He
2024-09-30 2:59 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] x86/mm/sme: fix the kdump kernel breakage " Baoquan He
2024-10-29 7:20 ` Baoquan He
2024-10-30 1:23 ` Andrew Morton
2024-10-30 2:54 ` Baoquan He
2024-10-30 11:31 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZyVxBbGYsEjifLgp@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=daniel.kiper@oracle.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lijiang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noodles@fb.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox