From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: VMX: Bury Intel PT virtualization (guest/host mode) behind CONFIG_BROKEN
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 14:46:50 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZylO2lHCydixvYCL@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c7b8f395-579b-40d9-b3eb-29a347f73ec9@intel.com>
On Mon, Nov 04, 2024, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> On 11/2/2024 2:50 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Hide KVM's pt_mode module param behind CONFIG_BROKEN, i.e. disable support
> > for virtualizing Intel PT via guest/host mode unless BROKEN=y. There are
> > myriad bugs in the implementation, some of which are fatal to the guest,
> > and others which put the stability and health of the host at risk.
> >
> > For guest fatalities, the most glaring issue is that KVM fails to ensure
> > tracing is disabled, and *stays* disabled prior to VM-Enter, which is
> > necessary as hardware disallows loading (the guest's) RTIT_CTL if tracing
> > is enabled (enforced via a VMX consistency check). Per the SDM:
> >
> > If the logical processor is operating with Intel PT enabled (if
> > IA32_RTIT_CTL.TraceEn = 1) at the time of VM entry, the "load
> > IA32_RTIT_CTL" VM-entry control must be 0.
> >
> > On the host side, KVM doesn't validate the guest CPUID configuration
> > provided by userspace, and even worse, uses the guest configuration to
> > decide what MSRs to save/load at VM-Enter and VM-Exit. E.g. configuring
> > guest CPUID to enumerate more address ranges than are supported in hardware
> > will result in KVM trying to passthrough, save, and load non-existent MSRs,
> > which generates a variety of WARNs, ToPA ERRORs in the host, a potential
> > deadlock, etc.
> >
> > Fixes: f99e3daf94ff ("KVM: x86: Add Intel PT virtualization work mode")
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > index 6ed801ffe33f..087504fb1589 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > @@ -217,9 +217,11 @@ module_param(ple_window_shrink, uint, 0444);
> > static unsigned int ple_window_max = KVM_VMX_DEFAULT_PLE_WINDOW_MAX;
> > module_param(ple_window_max, uint, 0444);
> > -/* Default is SYSTEM mode, 1 for host-guest mode */
> > +/* Default is SYSTEM mode, 1 for host-guest mode (which is BROKEN) */
> > int __read_mostly pt_mode = PT_MODE_SYSTEM;
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_BROKEN
> > module_param(pt_mode, int, S_IRUGO);
> > +#endif
>
> I like the patch, but I didn't find any other usercase of CONFIG_BROKEN in
> current Linux.
Ya, BROKEN is typically used directly in Kconfigs, e.g. "depends on BROKEN". But
I can't think of any reason using it in this way would be problematic.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-04 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-01 18:50 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: VMX: Mark Intel PT virtualization as BROKEN Sean Christopherson
2024-11-01 18:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: VMX: Bury Intel PT virtualization (guest/host mode) behind CONFIG_BROKEN Sean Christopherson
2024-11-04 1:56 ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-11-04 22:46 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-11-05 13:34 ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-11-04 8:23 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-11-04 23:52 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-11-08 9:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-11-01 18:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: VMX: Allow toggling bits in MSR_IA32_RTIT_CTL when enable bit is cleared Sean Christopherson
2024-11-04 1:57 ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-12-19 2:41 ` [PATCH 0/2] KVM: VMX: Mark Intel PT virtualization as BROKEN Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZylO2lHCydixvYCL@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox