From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f201.google.com (mail-pl1-f201.google.com [209.85.214.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E801E286A1 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2024 05:55:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730786132; cv=none; b=DPc1B17lgT5VoYV0/yrog/nenP4RpKGyUfQ1b6MUoUZsGp/UjFR8jcHmcud5m8DchbGPSrVndNEhlKx+mPP22Vb6DJavIpMannzY/ih4ygaVDddRQnNBWBCXQ0PhInHl3jKzLu9xd2cHjOBHFZEERtt1pQ/JmRuwr3OQoN2XmeQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730786132; c=relaxed/simple; bh=EM+nXUdvDCm6N3UmMRTXiFNomsft+6ngsfGryxa8oRM=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=SkQSl1IcrWmf4e2OO+CyrZ3tb1m08TLuMwMW47LMUnXoqpOfE7VquuU8YMvIh/uSTU3pmLw/7Rxa9aZ2G5icNIODCh+6u5MktiCce3yaZGs8+8jw904A3JQ3t+eS89OBE1iy0lbLTIEl2AUBlW0A6CpdOZIh78GR/bAXzex6RIg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=e+M44il+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--seanjc.bounces.google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="e+M44il+" Received: by mail-pl1-f201.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-20c70cc9d27so52489175ad.2 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 21:55:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1730786130; x=1731390930; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=IwQ41DxPwHg/LBZhq9U/e3vXFnxJog0O/oye+eR+OCc=; b=e+M44il+sxOWb3DmRtN9R8gggYSFTLNOR+lm+ljnfO7pl9eMdZH8lVD22xu0zedewA gJ7p7C/zI9b2eWUBX/VgyyUY/tBFqldpZlyCZLPC7cs/l88LAOpv6at9uWm13EMgaSgQ ZE8i3YewAFOTqgVVYmrwqlCYS/LRmhii3/IGsL/W4nqc1tH4jGVrcIm+9ovWcJ+5sW1m vQC5X3+xZtatRbZ0+2obNGtKcLsDMAnS9JlPDHosx+egc/WAdO5WN8Hxe9wA2i3WiX9J 7UWzUgawIdn6XaFN1K/YD09h2bnYGs3mdS7BZLB7wv6QVqozNYiI4p0V/KZAhVu9oCUA tIPQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1730786130; x=1731390930; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=IwQ41DxPwHg/LBZhq9U/e3vXFnxJog0O/oye+eR+OCc=; b=UHnKMEKkxeBCIHuuCH6KJtUmU5HEQ96NWGLOeH3OPsCK/eXlvxZqJiOJhwIrTlXddh OMa6Z+L9fN//VMG+kwrNNW7pcX6lK/gWzvkmhqtDOeXWCNafhFY6lQKSbbp5/iiVJZ4j bemHs4LNNATOr1wy4tB32mdmxCqw/oPluoXHkK/IEBmhldlYPl7joGgWSlI8r1NP+F8P dD8C0HPEp0AR03iMOQgBfDCfndCgvwiEz7NjtCyzRWd7KCucZRkxPB+BQFD4o1UzKWRS +n6MEAJckVdk0CO8OHIWC0o7Qp4bKT5P2or3vsL0aAEODrGZnMoKC3K2BBl0LqyFTYay H1jQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUbUciW63aCcCC5IRyd1oyGhhXiqulcG+8doPSu1EuJhwv90V8+N7GjMkMAFpkHPwCvlk8ozu+rAojtPd0=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzNt3YlJRktrXmmDQ03IL14ffCo5C3iLTdcIYJxqzl1Ag2LRhgP vGGZmFWcIF4lX6gU5JgUb3tnTq921cFHWMRDPLQmJUFbSYDkLvPXRJ4Wl6DghDcAMqXcxKUa4ER scg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEuUBIfr0pmpR1vDVKnUKE8uRFFxdiJcuGz5MS7Q3zeXILMN/DoM1JZEMxM44JWZ8BW2DwV5M3g8tM= X-Received: from zagreus.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:9d:3983:ac13:c240]) (user=seanjc job=sendgmr) by 2002:a17:902:f681:b0:20c:ce1f:13b6 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-210c68cf3b0mr1015755ad.3.1730786130327; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 21:55:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 21:55:28 -0800 In-Reply-To: <172848588854.1055233.16718265016131437325.b4-ty@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20241004220153.287459-1-mlevitsk@redhat.com> <172848588854.1055233.16718265016131437325.b4-ty@google.com> Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: increase guest sync timeout From: Sean Christopherson To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Maxim Levitsky Cc: Paolo Bonzini , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Wed, Oct 09, 2024, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Fri, 04 Oct 2024 18:01:53 -0400, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > When memslot_perf_test is run nested, first iteration of test_memslot_rw_loop > > testcase, sometimes takes more than 2 seconds due to build of shadow page tables. > > > > Following iterations are fast. > > > > To be on the safe side, bump the timeout to 10 seconds. > > > > [...] > > Nice timing (lol), the alarm can also fire spuriously when running selftests > on a loaded arm64 host. > > Applied to kvm-x86 fixes, thanks! > > [1/1] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: increase guest sync timeout > https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/7d4e28327d7e FYI, I rebased "fixes" onto 6.12-rc5 to avoid conflicts in other patches, new hash: [1/1] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: increase guest sync timeout https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/2d0f2a648147 FWIW, I am planning on getting this to Paolo in time for -rc7.