From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>, mingo@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/ioremap: introduce helper to implement xxx_is_setup_data()
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 15:56:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zz2WKFxkOJNZrI5H@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZzwA53x3KYQgDbeQ@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
On 11/19/24 at 11:07am, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 11/18/24 at 09:19am, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> > On 11/17/24 19:08, Baoquan He wrote:
......snip.......
> > > /*
> > > * Examine the physical address to determine if it is boot data by checking
> > > * it against the boot params setup_data chain.
> > > */
> > > -static bool memremap_is_setup_data(resource_size_t phys_addr,
> > > - unsigned long size)
> > > +static bool __ref __memremap_is_setup_data(resource_size_t phys_addr,
> >
> > Oh, I see why the __ref is needed now, because this calls an __init
> > function based on the early bool.
>
> Exactly, I explained in another thread replying to you, it could be
> ignored.
>
> >
> > While this nicely consolidates the checking, I'll let the x86
> > maintainers decide whether they like that an __init function is calling
> > a non __init function.
> ...... snip.......
> > > - return false;
> > > +static bool early_memremap_is_setup_data(resource_size_t phys_addr,
Hi Tom, Ingo,
What's your suggestion about the __init and __ref adding/removing on
below functions as Tom pointed out?
> >
> > This should retain the original __init reference.
>
> OK, so you suggest they are like below, right?
>
> static bool __ref __memremap_is_setup_data(resource_size_t phys_addr,
> bool early)
> {
> ......
> }
>
> static bool memremap_is_setup_data(resource_size_t phys_addr)
> {
> return __memremap_is_setup_data(phys_addr, false);
> }
>
> static bool __init early_memremap_is_setup_data(resource_size_t phys_addr)
> {
> return __memremap_is_setup_data(phys_addr, true);
> }
>
> I can make v3 if we all agree on this.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-20 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-18 1:08 [PATCH v2 0/2] x86/ioremap: clean up the mess in xxx_is_setup_data Baoquan He
2024-11-18 1:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] x86/ioremap: introduce helper to implement xxx_is_setup_data() Baoquan He
2024-11-18 15:19 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-11-19 3:07 ` Baoquan He
2024-11-19 10:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2024-11-20 7:21 ` Baoquan He
2024-11-20 7:56 ` Baoquan He [this message]
2024-11-20 8:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2024-11-20 14:14 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-11-25 9:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2024-11-26 8:15 ` Baoquan He
2024-11-18 1:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/mm: clean up unused parameters of functions Baoquan He
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zz2WKFxkOJNZrI5H@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox