public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	x86@kernel.org, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@quicinc.com>,
	Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	"Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)" <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	patches@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/9] x86/resctrl: Compute memory bandwidth for all supported events
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 09:36:26 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zz9vmuv6JoyYKSwo@agluck-desk3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6fada5bb-7ca2-4f6b-9174-109c429e8d68@intel.com>

On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 07:45:01PM -0800, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Tony,
> 
> On 11/13/24 4:17 PM, Tony Luck wrote:
> > Computing the bandwidth for an event is cheap, and only done once
> > per second. Doing so simplifies switching between events and allows
> > choosing different events per ctrl_mon group.
> 
> This just reads like some a general statement. There surely can be
> some context, problem and *some* description about how this patch goes
> about addressing the problem?

I've rewritten this in the problem ... solution format.

> > 
> > Suggested-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c | 72 ++++++++++++---------------
> >  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> > index 2176e355e864..da4ae21350c8 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> > @@ -663,9 +663,12 @@ static int __mon_event_count(u32 closid, u32 rmid, struct rmid_read *rr)
> >   */
> >  static void mbm_bw_count(u32 closid, u32 rmid, struct rmid_read *rr)
> >  {
> > -	u32 idx = resctrl_arch_rmid_idx_encode(closid, rmid);
> > -	struct mbm_state *m = &rr->d->mbm_local[idx];
> >  	u64 cur_bw, bytes, cur_bytes;
> > +	struct mbm_state *m;
> > +
> > +	m = get_mbm_state(rr->d, closid, rmid, rr->evtid);
> > +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!m))
> > +		return;
> >  
> >  	cur_bytes = rr->val;
> >  	bytes = cur_bytes - m->prev_bw_bytes;
> > @@ -826,54 +829,45 @@ static void update_mba_bw(struct rdtgroup *rgrp, struct rdt_mon_domain *dom_mbm)
> >  	resctrl_arch_update_one(r_mba, dom_mba, closid, CDP_NONE, new_msr_val);
> >  }
> >  
> > -static void mbm_update(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_mon_domain *d,
> > -		       u32 closid, u32 rmid)
> > +static void mbm_update_one_event(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_mon_domain *d,
> > +				 u32 closid, u32 rmid, enum resctrl_event_id evtid)
> >  {
> >  	struct rmid_read rr = {0};
> >  
> >  	rr.r = r;
> >  	rr.d = d;
> > +	rr.evtid = evtid;
> > +	rr.arch_mon_ctx = resctrl_arch_mon_ctx_alloc(rr.r, rr.evtid);
> > +	if (IS_ERR(rr.arch_mon_ctx)) {
> > +		pr_warn_ratelimited("Failed to allocate monitor context: %ld",
> > +				    PTR_ERR(rr.arch_mon_ctx));
> > +		return;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	__mon_event_count(closid, rmid, &rr);
> >  
> >  	/*
> > -	 * This is protected from concurrent reads from user
> > -	 * as both the user and we hold the global mutex.
> > +	 * If the software controller is enabled, compute the
> > +	 * bandwidth for this event id.
> >  	 */
> > -	if (is_mbm_total_enabled()) {
> > -		rr.evtid = QOS_L3_MBM_TOTAL_EVENT_ID;
> > -		rr.val = 0;
> > -		rr.arch_mon_ctx = resctrl_arch_mon_ctx_alloc(rr.r, rr.evtid);
> > -		if (IS_ERR(rr.arch_mon_ctx)) {
> > -			pr_warn_ratelimited("Failed to allocate monitor context: %ld",
> > -					    PTR_ERR(rr.arch_mon_ctx));
> > -			return;
> > -		}
> > -
> > -		__mon_event_count(closid, rmid, &rr);
> > +	if (is_mba_sc(NULL))
> > +		mbm_bw_count(closid, rmid, &rr);
> >  
> > -		resctrl_arch_mon_ctx_free(rr.r, rr.evtid, rr.arch_mon_ctx);
> > -	}
> > -	if (is_mbm_local_enabled()) {
> > -		rr.evtid = QOS_L3_MBM_LOCAL_EVENT_ID;
> > -		rr.val = 0;
> > -		rr.arch_mon_ctx = resctrl_arch_mon_ctx_alloc(rr.r, rr.evtid);
> > -		if (IS_ERR(rr.arch_mon_ctx)) {
> > -			pr_warn_ratelimited("Failed to allocate monitor context: %ld",
> > -					    PTR_ERR(rr.arch_mon_ctx));
> > -			return;
> > -		}
> > -
> > -		__mon_event_count(closid, rmid, &rr);
> > +	resctrl_arch_mon_ctx_free(rr.r, rr.evtid, rr.arch_mon_ctx);
> > +}
> >  
> > -		/*
> > -		 * Call the MBA software controller only for the
> > -		 * control groups and when user has enabled
> > -		 * the software controller explicitly.
> > -		 */
> > -		if (is_mba_sc(NULL))
> > -			mbm_bw_count(closid, rmid, &rr);
> > +static void mbm_update(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_mon_domain *d,
> > +		       u32 closid, u32 rmid)
> > +{
> > +	/*
> > +	 * This is protected from concurrent reads from user
> > +	 * as both the user and we hold the global mutex.
> 
> I understand that you are just copy&pasting a comment here but could you please
> help to avoid any obstacles by removing the code impersonation? Perhaps something like:
> 
> 	 * This is protected from concurrent reads from user
> 	 * as both the user and overflow handler hold the global mutex.
> 
> (please feel free to improve)

No improvement to the text needed. But I did move some words from 2nd
line to the first to look better (IMHO).

> > +	 */
> > +	if (is_mbm_total_enabled())
> > +		mbm_update_one_event(r, d, closid, rmid, QOS_L3_MBM_TOTAL_EVENT_ID);
> >  
> > -		resctrl_arch_mon_ctx_free(rr.r, rr.evtid, rr.arch_mon_ctx);
> > -	}
> > +	if (is_mbm_local_enabled())
> > +		mbm_update_one_event(r, d, closid, rmid, QOS_L3_MBM_LOCAL_EVENT_ID);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /*
> 
> Reinette

-Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-21 17:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-14  0:17 [PATCH v9 0/9] x86/resctrl: mba_MBps enhancement Tony Luck
2024-11-14  0:17 ` [PATCH v9 1/9] x86/resctrl: Introduce resctrl_file_fflags_init() to initialize fflags Tony Luck
2024-11-15 16:19   ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-20  0:38   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-21 17:21     ` Luck, Tony
2024-11-14  0:17 ` [PATCH v9 2/9] x86/resctrl: Prepare for per-ctrl_mon group mba_MBps control Tony Luck
2024-11-15 16:20   ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-18 23:47     ` Luck, Tony
2024-11-20  1:08   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-21 17:33     ` Luck, Tony
2024-11-22 21:33       ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-14  0:17 ` [PATCH v9 3/9] x86/resctrl: Modify update_mba_bw() to use per ctrl_mon group event Tony Luck
2024-11-15 16:21   ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-19  0:01     ` Luck, Tony
2024-11-19  0:51       ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-19  1:44         ` Luck, Tony
2024-11-19 17:36           ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-20  3:39   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-14  0:17 ` [PATCH v9 4/9] x86/resctrl: Compute memory bandwidth for all supported events Tony Luck
2024-11-15 13:53   ` Peter Newman
2024-11-15 16:59     ` Luck, Tony
2024-11-20  3:45   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-21 17:36     ` Luck, Tony [this message]
2024-11-14  0:17 ` [PATCH v9 5/9] x86/resctrl: Relax checks for mba_MBps mount option Tony Luck
2024-11-20  3:54   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-21 17:39     ` Luck, Tony
2024-11-14  0:17 ` [PATCH v9 6/9] x86/resctrl: Add "mba_MBps_event" file to ctrl_mon directories Tony Luck
2024-11-20  4:03   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-21 17:42     ` Luck, Tony
2024-11-14  0:17 ` [PATCH v9 7/9] x86/resctrl: Add write option to "mba_MBps_event" file Tony Luck
2024-11-14  0:17 ` [PATCH v9 8/9] x86/resctrl: Make mba_sc use total bandwidth if local is not supported Tony Luck
2024-11-14  0:17 ` [PATCH v9 9/9] x86/resctrl: Document the new "mba_MBps_event" file Tony Luck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zz9vmuv6JoyYKSwo@agluck-desk3 \
    --to=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=peternewman@google.com \
    --cc=quic_jiles@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox