From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
luto@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCh 0/3] x86,tlb: context switch optimizations
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 11:00:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZzR4tbZGX3U6yEiW@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241113095550.GBZzR3pg-RhJKPDazS@fat_crate.local>
* Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 07:27:47PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > While profiling switch_mm_irqs_off with several workloads,
> > it appears there are two hot spots that probably don't need
> > to be there.
>
> One of those three is causing the below here, zapping them from tip.
I've zapped the final two commits from tip:x86/mm that are the likely source of the
regression.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-13 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-09 0:27 [PATCh 0/3] x86,tlb: context switch optimizations Rik van Riel
2024-11-09 0:27 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86,tlb: update mm_cpumask lazily Rik van Riel
2024-11-13 2:59 ` [tip: x86/mm] x86/mm/tlb: Update " tip-bot2 for Rik van Riel
2024-11-09 0:27 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86,tlb: add tracepoint for TLB flush IPI to stale CPU Rik van Riel
2024-11-13 2:59 ` [tip: x86/mm] x86/mm/tlb: Add " tip-bot2 for Rik van Riel
2024-11-09 0:27 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86,tlb: put cpumask_test_cpu in prev == next under CONFIG_DEBUG_VM Rik van Riel
2024-11-13 2:59 ` [tip: x86/mm] x86/mm/tlb: Put cpumask_test_cpu() check in switch_mm_irqs_off() " tip-bot2 for Rik van Riel
2024-11-13 9:55 ` [PATCh 0/3] x86,tlb: context switch optimizations Borislav Petkov
2024-11-13 10:00 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2024-11-13 14:38 ` Rik van Riel
2024-11-14 11:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-11-13 14:55 ` Rik van Riel
2024-11-14 9:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2024-11-14 11:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-11-14 14:27 ` Rik van Riel
2024-11-14 14:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-11-14 11:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-11-14 11:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZzR4tbZGX3U6yEiW@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox