From: "Ragavendra B.N." <ragavendra.bn@gmail.com>
To: Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@outlook.com>
Cc: mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, inochiama@outlook.com,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk:sophgo: Remove uninitialized variable for CV1800 PLL
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:46:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZzZhit48lLt3zPlJ@desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MA0P287MB28229437858DBCD00CB05757FE5A2@MA0P287MB2822.INDP287.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 07:44:21AM +0800, Chen Wang wrote:
> Hi, Ragavendra,
>
> This patch should be revision for another https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20241113025947.3670504-1-ragavendra.bn@gmail.com,
> right? If so you need add version info in the patch title and changelogs
> etc. Please read https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#the-canonical-patch-format
> carefully and re-post the patch.
>
> Kindly reminder, better declare dropping of this patch email and repost v2.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chen
>
> On 2024/11/14 2:46, Ragavendra wrote:
> > Updating the detected value to 0 in the ipll_find_rate and removing it
> > from the method parameters as it does not depend on external input.
> > Updating the calls to ipll_find_rate as well and removing the u32 val
> > variable from ipll_determine_rate.
> >
> > Fixes: 80fd61ec4612 ("clk: sophgo: Add clock support for CV1800 SoC")
> > Signed-off-by: Ragavendra Nagraj <ragavendra.bn@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-cv18xx-pll.c | 11 ++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-cv18xx-pll.c b/drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-cv18xx-pll.c
> > index 29e24098bf5f..350195d4ac46 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-cv18xx-pll.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-cv18xx-pll.c
> > @@ -45,14 +45,13 @@ static unsigned long ipll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> > }
> > static int ipll_find_rate(const struct cv1800_clk_pll_limit *limit,
> > - unsigned long prate, unsigned long *rate,
> > - u32 *value)
> > + unsigned long prate, unsigned long *rate)
> > {
> > unsigned long best_rate = 0;
> > unsigned long trate = *rate;
> > unsigned long pre_div_sel = 0, div_sel = 0, post_div_sel = 0;
> > unsigned long pre, div, post;
> > - u32 detected = *value;
> > + u32 detected = 0;
> > unsigned long tmp;
> > for_each_pll_limit_range(pre, &limit->pre_div) {
> > @@ -77,7 +76,6 @@ static int ipll_find_rate(const struct cv1800_clk_pll_limit *limit,
> > detected = PLL_SET_PRE_DIV_SEL(detected, pre_div_sel);
> > detected = PLL_SET_POST_DIV_SEL(detected, post_div_sel);
> > detected = PLL_SET_DIV_SEL(detected, div_sel);
> > - *value = detected;
> > *rate = best_rate;
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -87,11 +85,10 @@ static int ipll_find_rate(const struct cv1800_clk_pll_limit *limit,
> > static int ipll_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_rate_request *req)
> > {
> > - u32 val;
> > struct cv1800_clk_pll *pll = hw_to_cv1800_clk_pll(hw);
> > return ipll_find_rate(pll->pll_limit, req->best_parent_rate,
> > - &req->rate, &val);
> > + &req->rate);
> > }
> > static void pll_get_mode_ctrl(unsigned long div_sel,
> > @@ -134,7 +131,7 @@ static int ipll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> > unsigned long flags;
> > struct cv1800_clk_pll *pll = hw_to_cv1800_clk_pll(hw);
> > - ipll_find_rate(pll->pll_limit, parent_rate, &rate, &detected);
> > + ipll_find_rate(pll->pll_limit, parent_rate, &rate);
> > pll_get_mode_ctrl(PLL_GET_DIV_SEL(detected),
> > ipll_check_mode_ctrl_restrict,
> > pll->pll_limit, &detected);
hi Chen,
This patch is the revision for the https://lore.kernel.org/linux-clk/20241113025947.3670504-1-ragavendra.bn@gmail.com .
I will update the version info and all and send in another email.
Please feel free to drop this patch email. I will shortly send v2 with the suggested updates.
--
Thanks,
Ragavendra N
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-14 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-13 18:46 [PATCH] clk:sophgo: Remove uninitialized variable for CV1800 PLL Ragavendra
2024-11-13 23:44 ` Chen Wang
2024-11-14 20:46 ` Ragavendra B.N. [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZzZhit48lLt3zPlJ@desktop \
--to=ragavendra.bn@gmail.com \
--cc=inochiama@outlook.com \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=unicorn_wang@outlook.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox