linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: Mete Durlu <meted@linux.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	seanjc@google.com, vschneid@redhat.com, huschle@linux.ibm.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	maddy@linux.ibm.com, srikar@linux.ibm.com, hdanton@sina.com,
	chleroy@kernel.org, vineeth@bitbyteword.org, frederic@kernel.org,
	arighi@nvidia.com, pauld@redhat.com, christian.loehle@arm.com,
	tj@kernel.org, tommaso.cucinotta@gmail.com, maz@kernel.org,
	rafael@kernel.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, kernellwp@gmail.com,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, jgross@suse.com,
	virtualization@lists.linux.dev, mingo@kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, yury.norov@gmail.com,
	kprateek.nayak@amd.com, iii@linux.ibm.com, corbet@lwn.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 04/11] sched/core: Try to use a preferred CPU in is_cpu_allowed
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 18:53:57 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a02c8bfe-5bec-4d2f-9183-8a0f856d3247@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <31646728-5af6-4f3d-b461-8992c213e230@linux.ibm.com>

Hi Mete, thanks for taking a look.

On 8/10/26 5:28 PM, Mete Durlu wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> ...
>> For majority of the cases this would still keep select_fallback_rq
>> as O(N). task_has_preferred_cpus which is O(N) is called only if
>> !cpu_preferred. Then task running there is expected to move out.
>> So subsequent it should run on preferred CPU. This becomes O(N**2)
>> only for tasks pinned only non preferred CPUs. That is rare case.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   kernel/sched/core.c  | 12 ++++++++++--
>>   kernel/sched/sched.h | 12 ++++++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> index a45f7c308329..9e8eec4451b6 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> @@ -2509,8 +2509,12 @@ static inline bool is_cpu_allowed(struct 
>> task_struct *p, int cpu)
>>           return cpu_online(cpu);
>>       /* Non kernel threads are not allowed during either online or 
>> offline. */
>> -    if (!(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
>> +    if (!(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) {
>> +        /* Try to use preferred CPU if task's affinity allows */
>> +        if (task_can_sched_on_preferred(cpu, p))
>> +            return false;
>>           return cpu_active(cpu);
>> +    }
>>       /* KTHREAD_IS_PER_CPU is always allowed. */
>>       if (kthread_is_per_cpu(p))
>> @@ -2520,7 +2524,11 @@ static inline bool is_cpu_allowed(struct 
>> task_struct *p, int cpu)
>>       if (cpu_dying(cpu))
>>           return false;
>> -    /* But are allowed during online. */
>> +    /* Try to keep unbound kthreads on a preferred CPU if possible. */
>> +    if (task_can_sched_on_preferred(cpu, p))
>> +        return false;
>> +
>> +    /* Otherwise, they are allowed to run on online CPU. */
>>       return cpu_online(cpu);
>>   }
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
>> index 26ae13c86b69..6de6366f2faa 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
>> @@ -4230,4 +4230,16 @@ DEFINE_CLASS_IS_UNCONDITIONAL(sched_change)
>>   #include "ext/ext.h"
>> +static inline bool task_can_sched_on_preferred(int cpu, struct 
>> task_struct *p)
> 
> 
> Sorry, I glanced to the earlier versions but I couldn't find
> the answer to my question. Trivial one but still.
> 
> FWICT, task_can_sched_on_preferred() is only being used in
> core.c, is there a reason why it is defined in
> kernel/sched/sched.h and not in core.c ?
> 

Will move it out of sched.h. Thanks for pointing it out.

> Thanks.
> -Mete

Also, thanks for checking that s390 change.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-10 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-24 14:07 [PATCH v9 00/11] sched, steal_governor: Introduce preferred CPUs and steal-driven vCPU backoff Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-24 14:07 ` [PATCH v9 01/11] sched/docs: Document cpu_preferred_mask and Preferred CPU concept Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-24 21:45   ` Yury Norov
2026-07-25  2:22     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-30  5:04       ` Yury Norov
2026-08-04 15:22         ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-24 14:07 ` [PATCH v9 02/11] cpumask: Introduce cpu_preferred_mask Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-24 20:00   ` Yury Norov
2026-07-25  3:16     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-24 14:07 ` [PATCH v9 03/11] sysfs: Add preferred CPU file Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-24 14:07 ` [PATCH v9 04/11] sched/core: Try to use a preferred CPU in is_cpu_allowed Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-10 11:58   ` Mete Durlu
2026-08-10 13:23     ` Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2026-07-24 14:07 ` [PATCH v9 05/11] sched/fair: Load balance only among preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-24 21:40   ` Yury Norov
2026-07-27  6:09     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-24 14:07 ` [PATCH v9 06/11] sched/core: Push current task from non preferred CPU Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-24 22:04   ` Yury Norov
2026-07-27  8:55     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-24 14:07 ` [PATCH v9 07/11] sched/debug: Add migration stats due to non preferred CPUs Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-24 14:07 ` [PATCH v9 08/11] virt: Introduce steal governor driver Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-24 14:07 ` [PATCH v9 09/11] virt/steal_governor: Add control knobs for handling steal values Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-24 14:07 ` [PATCH v9 10/11] virt/steal_governor: Implement steal_governor policy loop Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-24 21:05   ` Yury Norov
2026-07-25  3:54     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-27 14:42     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-08-10 12:12       ` Mete Durlu
2026-07-24 14:07 ` [PATCH v9 11/11] virt/steal_governor: Enable the driver Shrikanth Hegde
2026-07-24 22:07 ` [PATCH v9 00/11] sched, steal_governor: Introduce preferred CPUs and steal-driven vCPU backoff Yury Norov
2026-07-25  1:53   ` Shrikanth Hegde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a02c8bfe-5bec-4d2f-9183-8a0f856d3247@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=huschle@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=meted@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=pauld@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=tommaso.cucinotta@gmail.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vineeth@bitbyteword.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).