From: Zhiquan Li <zhiquan1.li@intel.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Jun Miao <jun.miao@intel.com>, <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-coco@lists.linux.dev>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
<mingo@redhat.com>, <bp@alien8.de>, "Du, Fan" <fan.du@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [V2 PATCH] x86/tdx: add VIRT_CPUID2 virtualization if REDUCE_VE was not successful
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 10:15:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a0676c7b-9e6d-4af4-87d5-f822ab247730@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b138cb84-3a34-40b3-a23d-6ff3708dae6b@intel.com>
On 2025/4/29 22:50, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 4/29/25 07:31, Jun Miao wrote:
>> REDUCE_VE can only be enabled if x2APIC_ID has been properly configured
>> with unique values for each VCPU. Check if VMM has provided an activated
>> topology configuration first as it is the prerequisite of REDUCE_VE and
>> ENUM_TOPOLOGY, so move it to reduce_unnecessary_ve(). The function
>> enable_cpu_topology_enumeration() was very little and can be
>> integrated into reduce_unnecessary_ve().
>
> Isn't this just working around VMM bugs? Shouldn't we just panic as
> quickly as possible so the VMM config gets fixed rather than adding kludges?
Now failed to virtualize these two cases will cause TD VM regression vs
legacy VM. Do you mean the panic will just for the #VE caused by CPUID
leaf 0x2? Or both (+ VMM not configure topology) will panic?
Currently the most customer's complaints come from the CPUID leaf 0x2
not virtualization, and most of access come from user space. Is it
appropriate for such behavior directly cause a guest kernel panic?
Thanks,
Zhiquan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-30 1:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-29 14:31 [V2 PATCH 0/1][Bug Report] and Fix TDX cpuid0x2 #VE causing segment Jun Miao
2025-04-29 14:31 ` [V2 PATCH] x86/tdx: add VIRT_CPUID2 virtualization if REDUCE_VE was not successful Jun Miao
2025-04-29 14:50 ` Dave Hansen
2025-04-30 2:15 ` Zhiquan Li [this message]
2025-04-30 9:33 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2025-04-30 11:10 ` Miao, Jun
2025-04-30 13:54 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2025-04-30 14:39 ` Miao, Jun
2025-04-30 13:44 ` Dave Hansen
2025-04-30 15:09 ` Zhiquan Li
2025-04-30 15:02 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a0676c7b-9e6d-4af4-87d5-f822ab247730@intel.com \
--to=zhiquan1.li@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fan.du@intel.com \
--cc=jun.miao@intel.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox