From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52A749460; Sat, 13 Sep 2025 01:30:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757727036; cv=none; b=KW0Kfz6LiBzsV1eV+dZkeiw7DbIbaovJWa1Vma4fylL3FUX0H4GkbyNByzH+cOifmAV1JI6vyskVWof5yjqRjjfFb8m9A1f6/IX0+rXOymhUyvIdcuA8ql+BSiBICcfDlkt1UvKk0C95MojxolPR62i+IDQZa2SGzFoTSukyTfI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757727036; c=relaxed/simple; bh=NqmYTFLNlgJCW+t+zwPLK3FAWSRW5RzSUK74Vz4Mfxg=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=JILY0SfDwPDle5F7kmTgSSfvIUPZ9Q3vAybg9ZGUG2TU74UO+NuX89SxGWt5GkrL+wEhuHmTdM1UYqpNWvtzzhcUwbwFfawQAAdxAygb4n/gWo8DvK8nx3TbSvirkLrtj2cslKXiPwE3PmqN51EGVVW9m6j8TOzIE0bKXwCqSHs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=NzFHYSp7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="NzFHYSp7" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A4D4C4CEF1; Sat, 13 Sep 2025 01:30:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1757727035; bh=NqmYTFLNlgJCW+t+zwPLK3FAWSRW5RzSUK74Vz4Mfxg=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=NzFHYSp7YYJ7PISif48D19LeoghOBY9n/DWZRzc9KcYpmPIXH0ZDmsZvAkCRQMbTw S6lnr+UmkVZPoO1v6oNL+xdFIhWUVt/b/gWQOQFTALRBdM4RDORACR/pGxR+1W/uo+ 0Zu3U2/oANPftZjHgnIOGjDLNaS31Xhusb/G3AXWNJHTyouv914OiyQuO9/Lv/+/dP saCS00n6CpkPZ+0Rple2xNopgnVhRuDzTGpzKStpHcigI9cJd0UfY2/xi455GYmlOh TSW/fmSfvBco1nXWbk0xfRywdpqMRmLQFlRtSbbzxvxLozNomCbSUr7kRQAG27Ymf7 uli+XnYJ9mdIQ== Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 19:30:29 -0600 (MDT) From: Paul Walmsley To: Alexandre Ghiti cc: Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Alexandre Ghiti , Anup Patel , Atish Patra , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Andrew Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] riscv: Strengthen duplicate and inconsistent definition of RV_X() In-Reply-To: <20250620-dev-alex-insn_duplicate_v5_manual-v5-2-d865dc9ad180@rivosinc.com> Message-ID: References: <20250620-dev-alex-insn_duplicate_v5_manual-v5-0-d865dc9ad180@rivosinc.com> <20250620-dev-alex-insn_duplicate_v5_manual-v5-2-d865dc9ad180@rivosinc.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On Fri, 20 Jun 2025, Alexandre Ghiti wrote: > RV_X() macro is defined in two different ways which is error prone. > > So harmonize its first definition and add another macro RV_X_mask() for > the second one. > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti Thanks. I updated this one to uppercase the name of the RV_X_MASK macro. That way it matches the naming of the rest of the macros in the file. Queued for v6.18. - Paul