linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
To: shuah@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpupower: Combine two condition checks into one statement in get_cpu_topology()
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 21:37:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a131b1b8-739f-67d6-3cf4-b9d87f4e7c20@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <372aa4f8-7e97-ee83-1078-6f80e28ffdf0@kernel.org>

>> @@ -140,18 +140,12 @@ int get_cpu_topology(struct cpupower_topology *cpu_top)
>>  	for (cpu = 0; cpu < cpus; cpu++) {
>>  		cpu_top->core_info[cpu].cpu = cpu;
>>  		cpu_top->core_info[cpu].is_online = cpupower_is_cpu_online(cpu);
>> -		if(sysfs_topology_read_file(
>> -			cpu,
>> -			"physical_package_id",
>> -			&(cpu_top->core_info[cpu].pkg)) < 0) {
>> -			cpu_top->core_info[cpu].pkg = -1;
>> -			cpu_top->core_info[cpu].core = -1;
>> -			continue;
>> -		}
>> -		if(sysfs_topology_read_file(
>> -			cpu,
>> -			"core_id",
>> -			&(cpu_top->core_info[cpu].core)) < 0) {
>> +		if (sysfs_topology_read_file(cpu, "physical_package_id",
>> +					     &(cpu_top->core_info[cpu].pkg))
>> +		    < 0 ||
>> +		    sysfs_topology_read_file(cpu, "core_id",
>> +					     &(cpu_top->core_info[cpu].core))
>> +		    < 0) {
> 
> This change takes the easily readable code into hard to read code,

I got other views around code readability for the shown software
design direction.


> even though it removes the duplicate code in the conditional.

Would you like to reduce a bit of duplicate code here?


> Please find a better way to make it not so hard to read.

Which source code layout would you find more appropriate then
in this use case?

Regards,
Markus

      reply	other threads:[~2017-11-21 20:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-20 18:19 [PATCH] cpupower: Combine two condition checks into one statement in get_cpu_topology() SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-21 19:47 ` Shuah Khan
2017-11-21 20:37   ` SF Markus Elfring [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a131b1b8-739f-67d6-3cf4-b9d87f4e7c20@users.sourceforge.net \
    --to=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuahkh@osg.samsung.com \
    --cc=trenn@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).