From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757306AbcINJJe (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2016 05:09:34 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:64787 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755489AbcINJJb (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2016 05:09:31 -0400 Subject: Re: virtio_blk: Clarification for communication difficulties? To: Cornelia Huck References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <02054675-8395-ac81-6863-e3a5cbfc9032@users.sourceforge.net> <7da823eb-939c-9ee6-32bf-db296e6a96f6@users.sourceforge.net> <44fd46f6-441a-d497-9157-7e2a0f3f45da@de.ibm.com> <20160914101009.6abef9f0.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_Borntr=c3=a4ger?= , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Minfei Huang , Stefan Hajnoczi , Julia Lawall , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Chao Fan From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 11:09:01 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160914101009.6abef9f0.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:TeCRs7Hq6KU1wuJHiBz+MVppN5AR+9VVkXZw1SnpgB4mGPFxYJY sVOT4N91xXBwipefazhxESxnJUiPLTQWUpCHXI9+g+mJjC7Vr4WCFfvK7b6S/gV2h0E/8wx e5dObG0B+DVtLL61faC+wHY2/Y2sKyMmaZw/tvr9u0t7eV4GYetRcLoL62v7u+vxIL6A9uD /odhqYbcniw8PVtwNIkYQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:SH3TTrEei9g=:0x/eeztdkD8+tRXWoh2qnW ImlZWYgWWJariFeTpzvSrgxc8n3nQ+0hg7CgeUgVnRhTCEHtFfN15D8dPZLV+CNDVTYY6aITf 1ZrfNhpWnDVycu2WaqHTEVETbRyIELi12Ug01MvHu+HIA5Divc1IzujgwVMfesgD8UQT02zjK 58orvHo+0vL1u6v+znopdk9NCqluRHFvC71kujeB0Kr8AubiGjA+XGWntH1ufX8KtO4yDFtaP TE4kJqEOsQonwuphnjxg3dCR2OQ8ZUcJxV6A/YP8+dNu0Xtg2qRJSQ+joxHGzuxbc9cWUh/Vr HsFkc3NuWCUIyLX/n1pV4AB40Bh2Z/K3cjO5f7WkGQJo121go29ZwRGQZY6aVKrloPGMy9QJO OrWHeUdYHQQhKtKN5D7ldXGShEKiHQS/D9D/7MkQaTOGGjCcfJOPnNK0bGjZG9UkXnNeOkeEe +Q7nKxW5JS/INEWlASRlILhop42aWrOGmOR+8gHsorMIrx7KwClkWGdkggl8LDhO55M2aEHxG GMGLHr8r21qR7vhWt7+/HaOuu+fTjOBNCC+AFMLrtC5MFdA+cN0/NKNzWLO2T4n5/ODt+Ii5W F9TrSNJsVzfA5DJM2PuC6LNU863PivK/6h1X4kPyU4bgNKdWiw1Lo8KN3n9pRSoW21e1Ct2NJ DuJyNyGy+nkJZmZdpsaLinAw8rXyIERzNljwzqgmmeAYb17GcUvi/BlY3oOXcDohORSCL/dCE 8ShKDrUIhP7Pp07n24l6zu1QtCM9FausVhvx5QCNKpgYPt0ul3T0r9HzUSyzHpwxd3UWLFRmL r6ljTOl Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > FWIW, he already gained a place on my ignore list for pestering me > offline about his patches and not stopping even when told to do so. How did I "pester" you "offline"? > So while I won't object if you choose to apply selected patches, Another bit of interesting information, isn't it? > I won't comment on any and won't take any (hey, I even won't see > them unless someone else replies...) I find this reaction strange. - I hope that our collaboration potential can be still constructive, can't it? Regards, Markus