The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: John Garry <john.garry@linux.dev>,
	James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com
Cc: p.raghav@samsung.com, sw.prabhu6@gmail.com,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: sd: fix error handling for sd_large_pool_create() call failure
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 12:39:17 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a19a428e-9e66-42ea-b95c-f4954b67ac87@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260707105555.1382237-1-john.garry@linux.dev>

On 7/7/26 19:55, John Garry wrote:
> If the sd_probe() -> sd_large_pool_create() call fails, then we incorrectly
> unwind the probe actions.
> 
> Currently for the sd_large_pool_create() failure we do no undo the
> device_add() call.
> 
> Fix this by mimicking the handling of device_add_disk() failure, in calling
> device_unregister() and put_disk(). The device_unregister() call will
> result in scsi_disk_release() being called, which unwinds many actions in
> sd_probe().
> 
> Fixes: 7179e626b76e ("scsi: sd: Enable sector size > PAGE_SIZE in SCSI sd driver")
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>

Xiuwei posted a series fixing this already:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260707030333.22245-1-yangxiuwei@kylinos.cn/

> ---
> I do wonder if it is simpler to always create this pool when we can
> support LBS. We only create a min of two elements in the pool, so
> hardly large.
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> index 599e75f33334..d18693d390b2 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
> @@ -4089,7 +4089,9 @@ static int sd_probe(struct scsi_device *sdp)
>  	if (sdp->sector_size > PAGE_SIZE) {
>  		if (sd_large_pool_create()) {
>  			error = -ENOMEM;
> -			goto out_free_index;
> +			device_unregister(&sdkp->disk_dev);
> +			put_disk(gd);
> +			goto out;
>  		}
>  	}
>  


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-08  3:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-07 10:55 [PATCH] scsi: sd: fix error handling for sd_large_pool_create() call failure John Garry
2026-07-08  3:39 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2026-07-08  5:14   ` John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a19a428e-9e66-42ea-b95c-f4954b67ac87@kernel.org \
    --to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=john.garry@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=p.raghav@samsung.com \
    --cc=sw.prabhu6@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox