Re: Bigggg Maxtor drives (fwd)

Ricky Beam
2002-01-10T19:15:59Z

On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Jim Crilly wrote:
>Actually it would seem this is just Andre's, not so subtle, way of
>trying to prove that his ATA133/48-bit addressing patches need included
>in 2.4.

And I'm sure many of his patches would be accepted if he sent them in the
method prescribed by Linus (loudly and on multiple occasions.) That is,
ONE patch to fix or support *ONE* thing. (Translation: minimize the amount
of stuff you screw up with your patch.) The "megapatch" is deleted on sight.

*I* would certainly appreciate individual patches.

--Ricky