From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Tina Zhang <tina.zhang@intel.com>, Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] iommu/vt-d: Use cache helpers in arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 16:10:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a3070cd9-84d4-4a1b-a5c8-a37d9c3dae3e@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240410155535.GI223006@ziepe.ca>
On 2024/4/10 23:55, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 10:08:41AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
>> /* Pages have been freed at this point */
>> static void intel_arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
>> struct mm_struct *mm,
>> unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
>> {
>> struct intel_svm *svm = container_of(mn, struct intel_svm, notifier);
>> + struct dmar_domain *domain = svm->domain;
>>
>> if (start == 0 && end == -1UL) {
>
> ULONG_MAX ideally.
Done.
>
>> - intel_flush_svm_all(svm);
>> + cache_tag_flush_all(domain);
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> - intel_flush_svm_range(svm, start,
>> - (end - start + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> VTD_PAGE_SHIFT, 0);
>> + cache_tag_flush_range(domain, start, end, 0);
>
> Be mindful of the note from the ARM driver:
>
> /*
> * The mm_types defines vm_end as the first byte after the end address,
> * different from IOMMU subsystem using the last address of an address
> * range. So do a simple translation here by calculating size correctly.
> */
> size = end - start;
I didn't find any documentation about the @end in this callback, but in
mm subsystem, it does like this,
flush_tlb_mm_range(mm, va, va + nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SHIFT, false);
So, yes, the @end in arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs callback is
different from the iommu gather.
I was not aware of this. Thanks for pointing this out.
>
> Given that the cache_tag_flush_range's are all tied directly to the
> iommu gather API, this is probably missing a -1 though perhaps it does
> not cause a functional problem here.
I will change it like below,
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
index 858a64fbdaab..15dcd1b30df1 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
@@ -146,7 +146,12 @@ static void
intel_arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
return;
}
- cache_tag_flush_range(domain, start, end, 0);
+ /*
+ * The mm_types defines vm_end as the first byte after the end
address,
+ * different from IOMMU subsystem using the last address of an
address
+ * range.
+ */
+ cache_tag_flush_range(domain, start, end - 1, 0);
}
static void intel_mm_release(struct mmu_notifier *mn, struct mm_struct
*mm)
Best regards,
baolu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-11 8:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-10 2:08 [PATCH v2 00/12] Consolidate domain cache invalidation Lu Baolu
2024-04-10 2:08 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] iommu/vt-d: Add cache tag assignment interface Lu Baolu
2024-04-10 2:08 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] iommu/vt-d: Add cache tag invalidation helpers Lu Baolu
2024-04-15 4:15 ` Zhang, Tina
2024-04-15 5:06 ` Baolu Lu
2024-04-15 6:46 ` Zhang, Tina
2024-04-10 2:08 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] iommu/vt-d: Add trace events for cache tag interface Lu Baolu
2024-04-10 2:08 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] iommu/vt-d: Use cache_tag_flush_all() in flush_iotlb_all Lu Baolu
2024-04-10 2:08 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] iommu/vt-d: Use cache_tag_flush_range() in tlb_sync Lu Baolu
2024-04-10 2:08 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] iommu/vt-d: Use cache_tag_flush_range_np() in iotlb_sync_map Lu Baolu
2024-04-10 2:08 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] iommu/vt-d: Cleanup use of iommu_flush_iotlb_psi() Lu Baolu
2024-04-10 2:08 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] iommu/vt-d: Use cache_tag_flush_range() in cache_invalidate_user Lu Baolu
2024-04-10 2:08 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] iommu/vt-d: Use cache helpers in arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs Lu Baolu
2024-04-10 15:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-11 8:10 ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2024-04-10 2:08 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] iommu/vt-d: Retire intel_svm_dev Lu Baolu
2024-04-10 2:08 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] iommu: Add ops->domain_alloc_sva() Lu Baolu
2024-04-10 2:08 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] iommu/vt-d: Retire struct intel_svm Lu Baolu
2024-04-10 15:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-11 7:55 ` Baolu Lu
2024-04-11 8:32 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-04-11 10:42 ` Baolu Lu
2024-04-11 13:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-11 13:13 ` Baolu Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a3070cd9-84d4-4a1b-a5c8-a37d9c3dae3e@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=tina.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox