From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753782AbXDJOKy (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2007 10:10:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753840AbXDJOKy (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2007 10:10:54 -0400 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.236]:20613 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753782AbXDJOKw (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2007 10:10:52 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Ou9LvmPZcRoQELDxd5dhsQZtcFLwwpigP0lcQb0/hK1V1uJCH7pY2g9KXB4mQ75yHDW0KqoyjYdnM8tuZNGCotjCszlu6sDNOZLP3qhJ3+xhkyzAyhHwvnJh6cgyYzsRD7k+RUtxUb/U4LOvcr+zngSzSQEXXNYuK6T1trAvpbQ= Message-ID: Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:10:48 -0700 From: "Ulrich Drepper" To: "Theodore Tso" , "Trond Myklebust" , "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Engel?=" , "H. Peter Anvin" , "Christoph Hellwig" , "Ulrich Drepper" , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , "Neil Brown" Subject: Re: If not readdir() then what? In-Reply-To: <20070410135641.GG13650@thunk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070407233037.GA16508@infradead.org> <20070408184129.GA20871@lazybastard.org> <20070408191955.GD29180@thunk.org> <46194260.3050900@zytor.com> <20070409014426.GA18580@thunk.org> <20070409110927.GA23240@lazybastard.org> <1176121897.6210.8.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20070409131918.GC18580@thunk.org> <1176127395.6210.34.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <20070410135641.GG13650@thunk.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/10/07, Theodore Tso wrote: > That might work. But if in the long term we want to separate out what > we can send back via telldir/seekdir, and some future new Posix > interface, [...] With all these discussions about fixes for telldir, do we want to persue an alternative interface where the user can explicitly specify that no telldir/seekdir will ever be used? From what I know so far it would make technical sense since we could speed up/reduce the memory footprint of readdir in 99% of most programs. But is the benefit large enough to warrant a second interface?