From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764935AbYEWFZ1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 May 2008 01:25:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762052AbYEWFY6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 May 2008 01:24:58 -0400 Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.30]:65081 "EHLO yw-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763557AbYEWFY5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 May 2008 01:24:57 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=W2xZT7xNCz+fUVOf1ZwmpdM0m7p/YXrA5ReI0q9rSlBpoxdFEyhnHAPeKzL4lCH68t61IQztLbdirz7M31dpPHHaxpYTBYBh6+nMLc0iD874w68wwzfSntVb0+nxBCrVnASulNHIgqnB0qB29L8bmzRTO9YwdnJms4jlmGzboE8= Message-ID: Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 22:24:56 -0700 From: "Ulrich Drepper" To: "Daniel Walker" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] futex: fix miss ordered wakeups Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1211519720.18130.98.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080523042923.594531457@mvista.com> <20080523042923.916202203@mvista.com> <1211519720.18130.98.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Daniel Walker wrote: > That's the problem we aren't just covering 99.99% we're trying to cover > 100% of cases.. If we don't do it in that one case we may as well not do > it at all. I have no problem with removing the other ordering. It was added because it limited overhead. It is completely wrong to have everybody pay for the needs for a very small minority.