From: "Guo, Wangyang" <wangyang.guo@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Radu Rendec <rrendec@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tianyou Li <tianyou.li@intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Dan Liang <dan.liang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/group_cpus: make group CPU cluster aware
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 10:37:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a361e213-1cf2-43be-9dd4-4f73a71906af@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260109144746.95feaf11e4214cc4895d4039@linux-foundation.org>
On 1/10/2026 6:47 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Jan 2026 14:13:32 -0500 Radu Rendec <rrendec@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>>>> This patch improves IRQ affinity by grouping CPUs by cluster within each
>>>>> NUMA domain, ensuring better locality between CPUs and their assigned
>>>>> NVMe IRQs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Tianyou Li <tianyou.li@intel.com>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
>>>>> Tested-by: Dan Liang <dan.liang@intel.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Wangyang Guo <wangyang.guo@intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> Patch hasn't attracted additional review so I'll queue this version for
>>>> some testing in mm.git's mm-nonmm-unstable branch. I'll add a
>>>> note-to-self that a changelog addition is desirable.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot for your time and support! Please let me know if you have
>>> any further comments or guidance. Any feedback would be appreciated.
>>
>> With this patch applied, I see a weird issue in a qemu x86_64 vm if I
>> start it with a higher number of max CPUs than active CPUs, for example
>> `-smp 4,maxcpus=8` on the qemu command line.
>>
>> What I see is the `while (1)` loop in alloc_cluster_groups() spinning
>> forever. Removing the `maxcpus=8` from the qemu command line fixes the
>> issue but so does reverting the patch :)
>
> Great, thanks, I'll drop the patch.
>
> I have notes here that an updated version is expected anyway. Perhaps
> due to planned changelog updates. And perhaps hopes for additional
> info regarding the runtime effects of the change.
This issue has been fixed and change log also updated as below:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260113022958.3379650-1-wangyang.guo@intel.com/T/#u
BR
Wangyang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-13 2:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-24 2:30 [PATCH] lib/group_cpus: make group CPU cluster aware Wangyang Guo
2025-12-21 19:10 ` Andrew Morton
2025-12-22 3:03 ` Guo, Wangyang
2026-01-09 19:13 ` Radu Rendec
2026-01-09 22:47 ` Andrew Morton
2026-01-13 2:37 ` Guo, Wangyang [this message]
2026-01-10 2:24 ` Guo, Wangyang
2026-01-13 1:59 ` Guo, Wangyang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a361e213-1cf2-43be-9dd4-4f73a71906af@intel.com \
--to=wangyang.guo@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rrendec@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tianyou.li@intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox