From: netdev@kapio-technology.com
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Kurt Kanzenbach" <kurt@linutronix.de>,
"Hauke Mehrtens" <hauke@hauke-m.de>,
"Woojung Huh" <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
"maintainer:MICROCHIP KSZ SERIES ETHERNET SWITCH DRIVER"
<UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>,
"Sean Wang" <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
"Landen Chao" <Landen.Chao@mediatek.com>,
"DENG Qingfang" <dqfext@gmail.com>,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"Claudiu Manoil" <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
"Clément Léger" <clement.leger@bootlin.com>,
"Jiri Pirko" <jiri@resnulli.us>,
"Ivan Vecera" <ivecera@redhat.com>,
"Roopa Prabhu" <roopa@nvidia.com>,
"Nikolay Aleksandrov" <razor@blackwall.org>,
"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"Christian Marangi" <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list:RENESAS RZ/N1 A5PSW SWITCH DRIVER"
<linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ETHERNET BRIDGE"
<bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/5] net: bridge: add dynamic flag to switchdev notifier
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 23:14:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a3bba3eb856a00b5e5e0c1e2ffe8749a@kapio-technology.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230117230806.ipwcbnq4jcc4qs7z@skbuf>
On 2023-01-18 00:08, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 07:57:10PM +0100, Hans J. Schultz wrote:
>> To be able to add dynamic FDB entries to drivers from userspace, the
>> dynamic flag must be added when sending RTM_NEWNEIGH events down.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans J. Schultz <netdev@kapio-technology.com>
>> ---
>> include/net/switchdev.h | 1 +
>> net/bridge/br_switchdev.c | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/switchdev.h b/include/net/switchdev.h
>> index ca0312b78294..aaf918d4ba67 100644
>> --- a/include/net/switchdev.h
>> +++ b/include/net/switchdev.h
>> @@ -249,6 +249,7 @@ struct switchdev_notifier_fdb_info {
>> u8 added_by_user:1,
>> is_local:1,
>> locked:1,
>> + is_dyn:1,
>> offloaded:1;
>> };
>>
>> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
>> index 7eb6fd5bb917..60c05a00a1df 100644
>> --- a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
>> +++ b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
>> @@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ static void br_switchdev_fdb_populate(struct
>> net_bridge *br,
>> item->added_by_user = test_bit(BR_FDB_ADDED_BY_USER, &fdb->flags);
>> item->offloaded = test_bit(BR_FDB_OFFLOADED, &fdb->flags);
>> item->is_local = test_bit(BR_FDB_LOCAL, &fdb->flags);
>> + item->is_dyn = !test_bit(BR_FDB_STATIC, &fdb->flags);
>
> Why reverse logic? Why not just name this "is_static" and leave any
> further interpretations up to the consumer?
>
My reasoning for this is that the common case is to have static entries,
thus is_dyn=false, so whenever someone uses a
switchdev_notifier_fdb_info struct the common case does not need to be
entered.
Otherwise it might also break something when someone uses this struct
and if it was 'is_static' and they forget to code is_static=true they
will get dynamic entries without wanting it and it can be hard to find
such an error.
>> item->locked = false;
>> item->info.dev = (!p || item->is_local) ? br->dev : p->dev;
>> item->info.ctx = ctx;
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-18 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-17 18:57 [RFC PATCH net-next 0/5] ATU and FDB synchronization on locked ports Hans J. Schultz
2023-01-17 18:57 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 1/5] net: bridge: add dynamic flag to switchdev notifier Hans J. Schultz
2023-01-17 23:08 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-01-18 22:14 ` netdev [this message]
2023-01-19 9:33 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-01-19 13:40 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-01-20 21:16 ` netdev
2023-01-17 18:57 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 2/5] net: dsa: propagate flags down towards drivers Hans J. Schultz
2023-01-17 23:17 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-01-18 22:35 ` netdev
2023-01-18 23:01 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-01-22 11:08 ` netdev
2023-01-17 18:57 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 3/5] drivers: net: dsa: add fdb entry flags incoming to switchcore drivers Hans J. Schultz
2023-01-17 18:57 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 4/5] net: bridge: ensure FDB offloaded flag is handled as needed Hans J. Schultz
2023-01-17 18:57 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 5/5] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: implementation of dynamic ATU entries Hans J. Schultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a3bba3eb856a00b5e5e0c1e2ffe8749a@kapio-technology.com \
--to=netdev@kapio-technology.com \
--cc=Landen.Chao@mediatek.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
--cc=clement.leger@bootlin.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dqfext@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=hauke@hauke-m.de \
--cc=ivecera@redhat.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kurt@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=roopa@nvidia.com \
--cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox