Re: [PATCH 20/80] drivers: drm: Remove redundant pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() calls

[Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>]

On Fri, 04 Jul 2025, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(), pm_runtime_put_sync_autosuspend(),
> pm_runtime_autosuspend() and pm_request_autosuspend() now include a call
> to pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). Remove the now-reduntant explicit call to
> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy().
>
> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> The cover letter of the set can be found here
> <URL:https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20250704075225.3212486-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>.
>
> In brief, this patch depends on PM runtime patches adding marking the last
> busy timestamp in autosuspend related functions. The patches are here, on
> rc2:
>
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git \
>                 pm-runtime-6.17-rc1

I would think it's better to wait for linux-pm to get merged to Linus'
tree and then backmerged to drm after -rc1 instead of cross-merging that
directly to drm.

Regardless, for merging the i915 changes via whichever tree,

Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel