Re: [PATCH] xhci: fix null pointer deref for xhci_urb_enqueue

[Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>]

On 17.11.2023 9.21, Kuen-Han Tsai wrote:
> The null pointer dereference happens when xhci_free_dev() frees the
> xhci->devs[slot_id] virtual device while xhci_urb_enqueue() is
> processing a urb and checking the max packet size.
> 
> [106913.850735][ T2068] usb 2-1: USB disconnect, device number 2
> [106913.856999][ T4618] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000010
> [106913.857488][ T4618] Call trace:
> [106913.857491][ T4618]  xhci_check_maxpacket+0x30/0x2dc
> [106913.857494][ T4618]  xhci_urb_enqueue+0x24c/0x47c
> [106913.857498][ T4618]  usb_hcd_submit_urb+0x1f4/0xf34
> [106913.857501][ T4618]  usb_submit_urb+0x4b8/0x4fc
> [106913.857503][ T4618]  usb_control_msg+0x144/0x238
> [106913.857507][ T4618]  do_proc_control+0x1f0/0x5bc
> [106913.857509][ T4618]  usbdev_ioctl+0xdd8/0x15a8
> 
> This patch adds a spinlock to the xhci_urb_enqueue function to make sure
> xhci_free_dev() and xhci_urb_enqueue() do not race and cause null
> pointer dereference.

Thanks, nice catch

This patch does however need some additional tuning

> 
> Signed-off-by: Kuen-Han Tsai <khtsai@google.com>
> ---
>   drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>   1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> index 884b0898d9c9..e0766ebeff0e 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> @@ -1522,23 +1522,32 @@ static int xhci_urb_enqueue(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct urb *urb, gfp_t mem_flag
>   	struct urb_priv	*urb_priv;
>   	int num_tds;
>   
> -	if (!urb)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	ret = xhci_check_args(hcd, urb->dev, urb->ep,
> -					true, true, __func__);
> -	if (ret <= 0)
> -		return ret ? ret : -EINVAL;
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&xhci->lock, flags);
> +
> +	if (!urb) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto done;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = xhci_check_args(hcd, urb->dev, urb->ep, true, true, __func__);
> +	if (ret <= 0) {
> +		ret = ret ? ret : -EINVAL;
> +		goto done;
> +	}
>   
>   	slot_id = urb->dev->slot_id;
>   	ep_index = xhci_get_endpoint_index(&urb->ep->desc);
>   	ep_state = &xhci->devs[slot_id]->eps[ep_index].ep_state;
>   
> -	if (!HCD_HW_ACCESSIBLE(hcd))
> -		return -ESHUTDOWN;
> +	if (!HCD_HW_ACCESSIBLE(hcd)) {
> +		ret = -ESHUTDOWN;
> +		goto done;
> +	}
>   
>   	if (xhci->devs[slot_id]->flags & VDEV_PORT_ERROR) {
>   		xhci_dbg(xhci, "Can't queue urb, port error, link inactive\n");
> -		return -ENODEV;
> +		ret = -ENODEV;
> +		goto done;
>   	}
>   
>   	if (usb_endpoint_xfer_isoc(&urb->ep->desc))
> @@ -1552,8 +1561,10 @@ static int xhci_urb_enqueue(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct urb *urb, gfp_t mem_flag
>   		num_tds = 1;
>   
>   	urb_priv = kzalloc(struct_size(urb_priv, td, num_tds), mem_flags);

kzalloc with spinlock held, should preferably be moved outside lock, otherwise should use GFP_ATOMIC

> -	if (!urb_priv)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> +	if (!urb_priv) {
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto done;
> +	}
>   
>   	urb_priv->num_tds = num_tds;
>   	urb_priv->num_tds_done = 0;
> @@ -1571,13 +1582,11 @@ static int xhci_urb_enqueue(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct urb *urb, gfp_t mem_flag

xhci_check_maxpacket() called here can't be called with spinlock held

>   			if (ret < 0) {
>   				xhci_urb_free_priv(urb_priv);
>   				urb->hcpriv = NULL;
> -				return ret;
> +				goto done;

Thanks
Mathias