From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfsd: allow SC_STATUS_FREEABLE when searching via nfs4_lookup_stateid()
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 07:52:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a4bdb6dd9d20fecce52a3fd35650aadc52d2e05e.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <173939479366.22054.8896171620747680077@noble.neil.brown.name>
On Thu, 2025-02-13 at 08:13 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Feb 2025, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > When a delegation is revoked, it's initially marked with
> > SC_STATUS_REVOKED, or SC_STATUS_ADMIN_REVOKED and later, it's marked
> > with the SC_STATUS_FREEABLE flag, which denotes that it is waiting for
> > s FREE_STATEID call.
> >
> > nfs4_lookup_stateid() accepts a statusmask that includes the status
> > flags that a found stateid is allowed to have. Currently, that mask
> > never includes SC_STATUS_FREEABLE, which means that revoked delegations
> > are (almost) never found.
> >
> > Add SC_STATUS_FREEABLE to the always-allowed status flags.
>
> There are 4 calls to nfsd4_lookup_stateid(). One already has
> SC_STATUS_FREEABLE passed. Which of the others need it?
> If all of them, then this patch is sensible but should also remove the
> flag in the one place it is already passed.
> If only one other call needs it, then maybe we should just pass it
> there?
>
> Could you at least include in the description some detail of what
> request is failing and which particular nfsd4_lookup_stateid() call is
> relevant in that case?
>
> Thanks,
> NeilBrown
>
I think they all need it.
The DELEG8 test gets a delegation, and then lets the lease time out. It
then does a READ op and tests that it gets back NFS4ERR_DELEG_REVOKED.
The read path calls nfs4_preprocess_stateid_op(), so it's needed there
specifically to fix that bug.
1ac3629bf0125 ensures that SC_STATUS_ADMIN_REVOKED is always set in the
allowed mask. If that's always allowed, then FREEABLE must be too.
There is only a very narrow window of time when ADMIN_REVOKED or
REVOKED is set, and FREEABLE is not.
I'll respin and remove the other FREEABLE flag, since I think it should
be implied everywhere.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > This fixes the pynfs DELEG8 test.
> > ---
> > fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > index 153eeea2c7c999d003cd1f36cecb0dd4f6e049b8..56bf07d623d085589823f3fba18afa62c0b3dbd2 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> > @@ -7051,7 +7051,7 @@ nfsd4_lookup_stateid(struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
> > */
> > statusmask |= SC_STATUS_REVOKED;
> >
> > - statusmask |= SC_STATUS_ADMIN_REVOKED;
> > + statusmask |= SC_STATUS_ADMIN_REVOKED | SC_STATUS_FREEABLE;
> >
> > if (ZERO_STATEID(stateid) || ONE_STATEID(stateid) ||
> > CLOSE_STATEID(stateid))
> >
> > ---
> > base-commit: 4990d098433db18c854e75fb0f90d941eb7d479e
> > change-id: 20250212-nfsd-fixes-fa8047082335
> >
> > Best regards,
> > --
> > Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> >
> >
>
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-13 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-12 16:29 [PATCH] nfsd: allow SC_STATUS_FREEABLE when searching via nfs4_lookup_stateid() Jeff Layton
2025-02-12 16:34 ` Chuck Lever
2025-02-12 16:36 ` Jeff Layton
2025-02-12 21:13 ` NeilBrown
2025-02-13 12:52 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2025-02-12 21:41 ` Dai Ngo
2025-02-13 12:55 ` Jeff Layton
2025-04-17 12:48 ` Benjamin Coddington
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a4bdb6dd9d20fecce52a3fd35650aadc52d2e05e.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox