From: "Kumar, Udit" <u-kumar1@ti.com>
To: CHANDRU DHAVAMANI <chandru@ti.com>,
Kamlesh Gurudasani <kamlesh@ti.com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Cc: <kristo@kernel.org>, <ssantosh@kernel.org>, <rishabh@ti.com>,
<vigneshr@ti.com>, <mturquette@baylibre.com>, <sboyd@kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
<u-kumar1@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clk: keystone: sci-clk: Adding support for non contiguous clocks
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 20:09:05 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a4fdbcfe-e0e0-4280-8638-e39b6b46778e@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c2b7f22d-f07d-4cac-8a01-af7b014e7ff4@ti.com>
On 2/6/2024 7:56 PM, CHANDRU DHAVAMANI wrote:
>
> On 06/02/24 19:45, Kumar, Udit wrote:
>>
>> On 2/6/2024 7:24 PM, Kamlesh Gurudasani wrote:
>>> Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 16:13-20240206, Udit Kumar wrote:
>>>>> Most of clocks and their parents are defined in contiguous range,
>>>>> But in few cases, there is gap in clock numbers[0].
>>>>> Driver assumes clocks to be in contiguous range, and add their clock
>>>>> ids incrementally.
>>>>>
>>>>> New firmware started returning error while calling get_freq and is_on
>>>>> API for non-available clock ids.
>>>>>
>>>>> In this fix, driver checks and adds only valid clock ids.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 3c13933c6033 ("clk: keystone: sci-clk: add support for
>>>>> dynamically probing clocks")
>>>>>
>>>>> [0]
>>>>> https://software-dl.ti.com/tisci/esd/latest/5_soc_doc/j7200/clocks.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Section Clocks for NAVSS0_CPTS_0 Device,
>>>>> clock id 12-15 not present.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@ti.com>
>>>>> while (num_parents--) {
>>>>> + /* Check if this clock id is valid */
>>>>> + ret = provider->ops->get_freq(provider->sci,
>>>>> + sci_clk->dev_id, clk_id, &freq);
>>>> get_freq is a bit expensive as it has to walk the clock tree to find
>>>> the clock frequency (at least the first time?). just wondering if
>>>> there is lighter alternative here?
>>>>
>>> How about get_clock? Doesn't read the registers at least.
>>
>> Said API needs, some flags to be passed,
>>
>> Can those flag be set to zero, Chandru ?
>
>
> get_clock doesn't require any flags to be passed.
May be firmware does not need it but I was referring to
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/clk/keystone/sci-clk.c#L78
>
>
>>
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Kamlesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-06 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-06 10:43 [PATCH v2] clk: keystone: sci-clk: Adding support for non contiguous clocks Udit Kumar
2024-02-06 13:14 ` Nishanth Menon
2024-02-06 13:54 ` Kamlesh Gurudasani
2024-02-06 14:15 ` Kumar, Udit
2024-02-06 14:26 ` CHANDRU DHAVAMANI
2024-02-06 14:39 ` Kumar, Udit [this message]
2024-02-06 15:54 ` Kamlesh Gurudasani
2024-02-07 5:33 ` Kumar, Udit
2024-02-07 7:23 ` CHANDRU DHAVAMANI
2024-02-07 7:33 ` Kumar, Udit
2024-02-07 8:06 ` CHANDRU DHAVAMANI
2024-02-06 14:14 ` Kumar, Udit
2024-02-06 14:21 ` Kamlesh Gurudasani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a4fdbcfe-e0e0-4280-8638-e39b6b46778e@ti.com \
--to=u-kumar1@ti.com \
--cc=chandru@ti.com \
--cc=kamlesh@ti.com \
--cc=kristo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=rishabh@ti.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox