From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>
Cc: hdegoede@redhat.com, markgross@kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] platform/x86: think-lmi: Correct NVME password handling
Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 15:03:43 +0300 (EEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a52f69f-2dc4-fe76-9f89-e1c143d2bb27@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230526171658.3886-3-mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>
On Fri, 26 May 2023, Mark Pearson wrote:
> NVME passwords identifier have been standardised across the Lenovo
> systems and now use udrp and adrp (user and admin level) instead of
> unvp and mnvp.
>
> This should apparently be backwards compatible.
>
> Also cleaned up so the index is set to a default of 1 rather than 0
> as this just makes more sense (there is no device 0).
These two sound entirely separate changes. If that's the case, please
make own patch from the send change.
Hmm, index_store() still allows 0, is that also related here? Please check
also ABI documentation as index default seems to be mentioned there as
well.
--
i.
> Signed-off-by: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>
> ---
> Changes in v2 & v3: None. Version bumped in series
>
> drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
> index c7e98fbe7c3d..1c02958035ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
> @@ -456,9 +456,9 @@ static ssize_t new_password_store(struct kobject *kobj,
> sprintf(pwd_type, "mhdp%d", setting->index);
> } else if (setting == tlmi_priv.pwd_nvme) {
> if (setting->level == TLMI_LEVEL_USER)
> - sprintf(pwd_type, "unvp%d", setting->index);
> + sprintf(pwd_type, "udrp%d", setting->index);
> else
> - sprintf(pwd_type, "mnvp%d", setting->index);
> + sprintf(pwd_type, "adrp%d", setting->index);
> } else {
> sprintf(pwd_type, "%s", setting->pwd_type);
> }
> @@ -1524,6 +1524,10 @@ static int tlmi_analyze(void)
> if (!tlmi_priv.pwd_nvme)
> goto fail_clear_attr;
>
> + /* Set default hdd/nvme index to 1 as there is no device 0 */
> + tlmi_priv.pwd_hdd->index = 1;
> + tlmi_priv.pwd_nvme->index = 1;
> +
> if (tlmi_priv.pwdcfg.core.password_state & TLMI_HDD_PWD) {
> /* Check if PWD is configured and set index to first drive found */
> if (tlmi_priv.pwdcfg.ext.hdd_user_password ||
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-29 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-26 17:16 [PATCH v3 1/5] platform/x86: think-lmi: Enable opcode support on BIOS settings Mark Pearson
2023-05-26 17:16 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] platform/x86: think-lmi: Correct System password interface Mark Pearson
2023-05-29 11:36 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-05-29 14:44 ` Mark Pearson
2023-05-29 15:50 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-05-29 16:10 ` Mark Pearson
2023-05-26 17:16 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] platform/x86: think-lmi: Correct NVME password handling Mark Pearson
2023-05-29 12:03 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2023-05-29 14:58 ` Mark Pearson
2023-05-29 15:41 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-05-29 16:06 ` Mark Pearson
2023-05-26 17:16 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] platform/x86: think-lmi: Don't display unnecessary authentication settings Mark Pearson
2023-05-29 12:05 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-05-29 14:50 ` Mark Pearson
2023-05-26 17:16 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] platform/x86: think-lmi: mutex protection around multiple WMI calls Mark Pearson
2023-05-29 12:23 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-05-29 14:03 ` Mark Pearson
2023-05-29 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] platform/x86: think-lmi: Enable opcode support on BIOS settings Ilpo Järvinen
2023-05-29 14:49 ` Mark Pearson
2023-05-29 15:36 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-05-29 16:06 ` Mark Pearson
2023-05-30 10:54 ` Hans de Goede
2023-05-30 13:08 ` Mark Pearson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a52f69f-2dc4-fe76-9f89-e1c143d2bb27@linux.intel.com \
--to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markgross@kernel.org \
--cc=mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox