public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>
Cc: hdegoede@redhat.com, markgross@kernel.org,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] platform/x86: think-lmi: Correct NVME password handling
Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 15:03:43 +0300 (EEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a52f69f-2dc4-fe76-9f89-e1c143d2bb27@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230526171658.3886-3-mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>

On Fri, 26 May 2023, Mark Pearson wrote:

> NVME passwords identifier have been standardised across the Lenovo
> systems and now use udrp and adrp (user and admin level) instead of
> unvp and mnvp.
> 
> This should apparently be backwards compatible.
> 
> Also cleaned up so the index is set to a default of 1 rather than 0
> as this just makes more sense (there is no device 0).

These two sound entirely separate changes. If that's the case, please 
make own patch from the send change.

Hmm, index_store() still allows 0, is that also related here? Please check 
also ABI documentation as index default seems to be mentioned there as 
well.

-- 
 i.

> Signed-off-by: Mark Pearson <mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca>
> ---
> Changes in v2 & v3: None. Version bumped in series
> 
>  drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c | 8 ++++++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
> index c7e98fbe7c3d..1c02958035ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/think-lmi.c
> @@ -456,9 +456,9 @@ static ssize_t new_password_store(struct kobject *kobj,
>  				sprintf(pwd_type, "mhdp%d", setting->index);
>  		} else if (setting == tlmi_priv.pwd_nvme) {
>  			if (setting->level == TLMI_LEVEL_USER)
> -				sprintf(pwd_type, "unvp%d", setting->index);
> +				sprintf(pwd_type, "udrp%d", setting->index);
>  			else
> -				sprintf(pwd_type, "mnvp%d", setting->index);
> +				sprintf(pwd_type, "adrp%d", setting->index);
>  		} else {
>  			sprintf(pwd_type, "%s", setting->pwd_type);
>  		}
> @@ -1524,6 +1524,10 @@ static int tlmi_analyze(void)
>  		if (!tlmi_priv.pwd_nvme)
>  			goto fail_clear_attr;
>  
> +		/* Set default hdd/nvme index to 1 as there is no device 0 */
> +		tlmi_priv.pwd_hdd->index = 1;
> +		tlmi_priv.pwd_nvme->index = 1;
> +
>  		if (tlmi_priv.pwdcfg.core.password_state & TLMI_HDD_PWD) {
>  			/* Check if PWD is configured and set index to first drive found */
>  			if (tlmi_priv.pwdcfg.ext.hdd_user_password ||
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-29 12:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-26 17:16 [PATCH v3 1/5] platform/x86: think-lmi: Enable opcode support on BIOS settings Mark Pearson
2023-05-26 17:16 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] platform/x86: think-lmi: Correct System password interface Mark Pearson
2023-05-29 11:36   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-05-29 14:44     ` Mark Pearson
2023-05-29 15:50       ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-05-29 16:10         ` Mark Pearson
2023-05-26 17:16 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] platform/x86: think-lmi: Correct NVME password handling Mark Pearson
2023-05-29 12:03   ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2023-05-29 14:58     ` Mark Pearson
2023-05-29 15:41       ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-05-29 16:06         ` Mark Pearson
2023-05-26 17:16 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] platform/x86: think-lmi: Don't display unnecessary authentication settings Mark Pearson
2023-05-29 12:05   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-05-29 14:50     ` Mark Pearson
2023-05-26 17:16 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] platform/x86: think-lmi: mutex protection around multiple WMI calls Mark Pearson
2023-05-29 12:23   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-05-29 14:03     ` Mark Pearson
2023-05-29 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] platform/x86: think-lmi: Enable opcode support on BIOS settings Ilpo Järvinen
2023-05-29 14:49   ` Mark Pearson
2023-05-29 15:36     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-05-29 16:06       ` Mark Pearson
2023-05-30 10:54 ` Hans de Goede
2023-05-30 13:08   ` Mark Pearson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a52f69f-2dc4-fe76-9f89-e1c143d2bb27@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=markgross@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpearson-lenovo@squebb.ca \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox