From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 971AA3D88FA for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2026 22:19:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783635554; cv=none; b=UqHoB+9qlaOqF69SOIFuUWFFiGcQRZzqmyRGrAcEvOcleouM8ef/SWO2u6Opl66aTKHo8eodeuyHyHeu/oRsnE1kE6100Rj34Twg2vAdOREdNZ4fo3XG0vJATerLlZdT2OAP0AXh0t+j+TEdNWsLUuLV+9iPATNdPR0bGYfETpM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783635554; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jyh2A0KvW3lcGWCJ8dc1ooz0fri+7K+hq6J6ZcJyNGQ=; h=Date:Message-ID:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=iBmSrHrOkKcUjOjP0nyXyekmp1jLmT2H8Tcd7+L6laDiREjUQ6a6pfdLZiTWDtwn/K/UJvBw53wJvNx6bNIY/HL80qsdxD+Pt8zhd5eyAwSWfc7CJiCjFHj6uhTUD8Vjp+aJvO9vMnKkmyAZv6jUlns9bNiWKqcbEWoe60DplrI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=fObKwJ01; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="fObKwJ01" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EF71F1F000E9; Thu, 9 Jul 2026 22:19:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1783635553; bh=jyh2A0KvW3lcGWCJ8dc1ooz0fri+7K+hq6J6ZcJyNGQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=fObKwJ01RZD26RKH3WThihV0KCAwXiae9/1bsCBgHWtIJhd0btLoE6U4MFLot5zgy K071wnNjbLeIswiG1XaKz0CPB5DyW3wrgl2nuV6Yl4gZ3Qa9h2RNRXnCg9bZbWrviF RX/BZznRayK5flXROwlCS2MrqwF5ZAdmPy3ARGTAIcnLQQFUTIaDMSqFRjA0cuS7Wy n5dlFXllHsUtE1DrYtNt7oG2PZFNseD0TCxE7/dA3dOTnXLfEFGgPJhjRwDr7IinvL LENaNnzJW2uuU3e5eymji0muWyPeECanTjCWdMLZFxz89K1bPqqy/OADxwkTQe7eHf gk4JJ1UIQTIGg== Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 12:19:12 -1000 Message-ID: From: Tejun Heo To: Marco Crivellari Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lai Jiangshan , Frederic Weisbecker , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Michal Hocko , Breno Leitao Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] workqueue: Make alloc_workqueue() unbound by default In-Reply-To: <20260709102510.180513-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com> References: <20260709102510.180513-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hello, Marco. Can we hold off on the next tree-wide sweep until we settle the direction on the percpu/unbound unification? The change itself is behavior-neutral and dropping WQ_UNBOUND eventually makes sense, so no objection to the goal, I'd just rather not do another mass conversion before that's resolved. As for the patch, why not start by just defaulting to WQ_UNBOUND when neither flag is specified, instead of inverting all the internal tests now? Thanks. -- tejun