From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D98C3A5A4 for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 01:59:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 742352184D for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2019 01:59:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729147AbfIBB7z (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Sep 2019 21:59:55 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:37770 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728982AbfIBB7z (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Sep 2019 21:59:55 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Sep 2019 18:59:54 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,457,1559545200"; d="scan'208";a="381725642" Received: from allen-box.sh.intel.com (HELO [10.239.159.136]) ([10.239.159.136]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Sep 2019 18:59:50 -0700 Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, David Woodhouse , Joerg Roedel , Bjorn Helgaas , ashok.raj@intel.com, jacob.jun.pan@intel.com, alan.cox@intel.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, Ingo Molnar , Greg Kroah-Hartman , pengfei.xu@intel.com, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Marek Szyprowski , Robin Murphy , Jonathan Corbet , Boris Ostrovsky , Juergen Gross , Stefano Stabellini , Steven Rostedt , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/7] swiotlb: Zero out bounce buffer for untrusted device To: Christoph Hellwig References: <20190830071718.16613-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> <20190830071718.16613-4-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> <20190830073130.GA10471@lst.de> From: Lu Baolu Message-ID: Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 09:58:27 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190830073130.GA10471@lst.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Christoph, On 8/30/19 3:31 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 03:17:14PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote: >> +#include > >> + if (dev_is_untrusted(hwdev) && zero_size) >> + memset(zero_addr, 0, zero_size); > > As said before swiotlb must not grow pci dependencies like this. I understand your concern. I will try to remove this dependency in the next version. > Please move the untrusted flag to struct device. The untrusted flag is introduced in another series. I agree that we could consider to move it to struct device, but I think making it in a separated patch looks better. Best regards, Lu Baolu