From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, bp@alien8.de,
acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, irogers@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
eranian@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 3/7] perf: attach/detach PMU specific data
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 09:50:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a619615f-3313-4e55-a780-f280fbb643dc@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250314125958.GC36322@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 2025-03-14 8:59 a.m., Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 05:02:38PM -0700, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
>
>> @@ -12551,6 +12813,14 @@ perf_event_alloc(struct perf_event_attr *attr, int cpu,
>> if (err)
>> return ERR_PTR(err);
>>
>> + if (event->attach_state & PERF_ATTACH_TASK_DATA) {
>> + err = attach_perf_ctx_data(event);
>> + if (err) {
>> + security_perf_event_free(event);
>> + return ERR_PTR(err);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> /* symmetric to unaccount_event() in _free_event() */
>> account_event(event);
>>
>
> This seems weird. We just pushed all the error handling into
> __free_event(), and now you're adding one special case back.
>
> Also, you've placed it after security_perf_event_alloc(), which I
> _think_ wants to be last.
Right, I will send a new series to fix it.
Thanks,
Kan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-14 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-14 0:02 [PATCH V9 1/7] perf: Save PMU specific data in task_struct kan.liang
2025-03-14 0:02 ` [PATCH V9 2/7] locking/percpu-rwsem: Add guard support kan.liang
2025-03-14 0:02 ` [PATCH V9 3/7] perf: attach/detach PMU specific data kan.liang
2025-03-14 12:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-14 13:50 ` Liang, Kan [this message]
2025-03-14 14:38 ` Liang, Kan
2025-03-14 21:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-03-14 0:02 ` [PATCH V9 4/7] perf: Supply task information to sched_task() kan.liang
2025-03-14 0:02 ` [PATCH V9 5/7] perf/x86/lbr: Fix shorter LBRs call stacks for the system-wide mode kan.liang
2025-03-14 0:02 ` [PATCH V9 6/7] perf/x86: Remove swap_task_ctx() kan.liang
2025-03-14 0:02 ` [PATCH V9 7/7] perf: Clean up pmu specific data kan.liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a619615f-3313-4e55-a780-f280fbb643dc@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox