From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Myron Stowe" <myron.stowe@redhat.com>,
"Juha-Pekka Heikkila" <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>,
"Juha-Pekka Heikkila" <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
linux-acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux PCI" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Benoit Grégoire" <benoitg@coeus.ca>,
"Hui Wang" <hui.wang@canonical.com>
Subject: [5.17 regression] "x86/PCI: Ignore E820 reservations for bridge windows on newer systems" breaks suspend/resume
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 16:25:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a7ad05fe-c2ab-a6d9-b66e-68e8c5688420@redhat.com> (raw)
Hi All,
Unfortunately I've just learned that commit 7f7b4236f204 ("x86/PCI:
Ignore E820 reservations for bridge windows on newer systems"):
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=7f7b4236f2040d19df1ddaf30047128b41e78de7
breaks suspend/resume on at least one laptop model, the Lenovo ThinkPad
X1 gen 2, see:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029207
This regression was actually caught be Fedora already carrying this
patch for a while now and as such it has been reproduced with 5.15
with an older version of the patch which still allowed turning the
new behavior of by adding "pci=use_e820". Dmesg output with and
without the option has just been attached to the bug, I've not
analyzed this any further yet.
I guess that for now this means that we need to revert commit
7f7b4236f204. Rafael, I'll send you a revert with a commit msg
explaining why this needs to be reverted tomorrow.
More interesting IMHO is finding out another solution. Both the touchpad
problem which got me looking into this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868899
As well as the thunderbolt hotplug issue Mika was looking at:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206459
both are cases where we fail to find a memory-window for a
BAR which has not been setup yet.
So I see a couple of options here:
1. Detect that the e820 reservations fully cover (one of)
the PCI bridge main 32 bit memory windows and if that happens
ignore them. This actually was my first plan when I started
working on this. In the end I choose the other option
because Bjorn indicated that in hindsight honoring the e820
reservations might have been a mistake and maybe we should
get rid of honoring them all together.
2. Have a flag which, when we fail to alloc a 32 bit
(or 64 bit) memory PCI BAR, is set if not already set
and then retry the alloc. And make the e820 reservation
carve-out get skipped in this case.
3. When booting with pci=nocrs as a workaround for
the touchpad case a 64 but memory window ends up getting
used. There already is some special handling for some
AMD bridges where if there are no 64 bit memory Windows
in the _CRS for the bridge, one gets added. Maybe we need
to do the same for Intel bridges ?
Please let me know which of these options you think I should
try to implement next; of course alternative ideas for fixing
this are also welcome.
Regards,
Hans
next reply other threads:[~2022-02-08 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-08 15:25 Hans de Goede [this message]
2022-02-08 15:59 ` [5.17 regression] "x86/PCI: Ignore E820 reservations for bridge windows on newer systems" breaks suspend/resume Hans de Goede
2022-02-08 16:38 ` Mika Westerberg
2022-02-09 12:18 ` Hans de Goede
2022-02-09 15:12 ` Hans de Goede
2022-02-09 16:01 ` Mika Westerberg
2022-02-09 16:08 ` Hans de Goede
2022-02-10 6:39 ` Mika Westerberg
2022-02-14 12:42 ` Hans de Goede
2022-02-14 13:42 ` Mika Westerberg
2022-02-14 13:58 ` Hans de Goede
2022-02-09 16:06 ` Hans de Goede
2022-02-09 9:13 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a7ad05fe-c2ab-a6d9-b66e-68e8c5688420@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=benoitg@coeus.ca \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hui.wang@canonical.com \
--cc=juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=myron.stowe@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox