The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Verma, Devendra" <devverma@amd.com>
To: Frank.Li@oss.nxp.com, "Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
	"Vinod Koul" <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	"Gustavo Pimentel" <Gustavo.Pimentel@synopsys.com>,
	"Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
	"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
	"Niklas Cassel" <cassel@kernel.org>
Cc: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Koichiro Den <den@valinux.co.jp>,
	imx@lists.linux.dev, Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: flatten desc structions and simplify code
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 22:58:41 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a7c49756-b042-445c-b012-e5162446f9cf@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260710-edma_ll-v6-0-1471d278b73a@nxp.com>



On 10-Jul-26 22:17, Frank.Li@oss.nxp.com wrote:
> Basic change
> 
> struct dw_edma_desc *desc
>         └─ chunk list
>              └─ burst list
> 
> To
> 
> struct dw_edma_desc *desc
>              └─ burst[n]
> 
> Flatten desc structions and simplify code.
> 
> I only test eDMA part, not hardware test hdma part.
> 

The patch series v5 was tested for non-LL mode for HDMA.
The testing included varying data sizes for transfer and running C2H 
(Write) & H2C (Read) for a specified duration on all the 8 Read and 8 
Write channels.
non-LL code works fine with this patch series.
For non-LL the changes are similar to v5 in v6.

Tested-By: Devendra Verma <devendra.verma@amd.com>

> The finial goal is dymatic add DMA request when DMA running. So needn't
> wait for irq for fetch next round DMA request.
> 
> This work is neccesary to for dymatic DMA request appending.
> 
> The post this part first to review and test firstly during working dymatic
> DMA part.
> 
> performance is little bit better. Use NVME as EP function
> 
> Before
> 
>    Rnd read,    4KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=6660, BW=26.0MiB/s (27.3MB/s)
>    Rnd read,    4KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=28.6k, BW=112MiB/s (117MB/s)
>    Rnd read,    4KB, QD=32, 4 jobs:  IOPS=33.4k, BW=130MiB/s (137MB/s)
>    Rnd read,  128KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=914, BW=114MiB/s (120MB/s)
>    Rnd read,  128KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=1204, BW=151MiB/s (158MB/s)
>    Rnd read,  128KB, QD=32, 4 jobs:  IOPS=1255, BW=157MiB/s (165MB/s)
>    Rnd read,  512KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=248, BW=124MiB/s (131MB/s)
>    Rnd read,  512KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=353, BW=177MiB/s (185MB/s)
>    Rnd read,  512KB, QD=32, 4 jobs:  IOPS=388, BW=194MiB/s (204MB/s)
>    Rnd write,   4KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=6241, BW=24.4MiB/s (25.6MB/s)
>    Rnd write,   4KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=24.7k, BW=96.5MiB/s (101MB/s)
>    Rnd write,   4KB, QD=32, 4 jobs:  IOPS=26.9k, BW=105MiB/s (110MB/s)
>    Rnd write, 128KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=780, BW=97.5MiB/s (102MB/s)
>    Rnd write, 128KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=987, BW=123MiB/s (129MB/s)
>    Rnd write, 128KB, QD=32, 4 jobs:  IOPS=1021, BW=128MiB/s (134MB/s)
>    Seq read,  128KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=1190, BW=149MiB/s (156MB/s)
>    Seq read,  128KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=1400, BW=175MiB/s (184MB/s)
>    Seq read,  512KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=243, BW=122MiB/s (128MB/s)
>    Seq read,  512KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=355, BW=178MiB/s (186MB/s)
>    Seq read,    1MB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=191, BW=192MiB/s (201MB/s)
>    Seq write, 128KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=784, BW=98.1MiB/s (103MB/s)
>    Seq write, 128KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=1030, BW=129MiB/s (135MB/s)
>    Seq write, 512KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=216, BW=108MiB/s (114MB/s)
>    Seq write, 512KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=295, BW=148MiB/s (155MB/s)
>    Seq write,   1MB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=164, BW=165MiB/s (173MB/s)
>    Rnd rdwr, 4K..1MB, QD=8, 4 jobs:  IOPS=250, BW=126MiB/s (132MB/s)
>    IOPS=261, BW=132MiB/s (138MB/s
> 
> After
>    Rnd read,    4KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=6780, BW=26.5MiB/s (27.8MB/s)
>    Rnd read,    4KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=28.6k, BW=112MiB/s (117MB/s)
>    Rnd read,    4KB, QD=32, 4 jobs:  IOPS=33.4k, BW=130MiB/s (137MB/s)
>    Rnd read,  128KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=1188, BW=149MiB/s (156MB/s)
>    Rnd read,  128KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=1440, BW=180MiB/s (189MB/s)
>    Rnd read,  128KB, QD=32, 4 jobs:  IOPS=1282, BW=160MiB/s (168MB/s)
>    Rnd read,  512KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=254, BW=127MiB/s (134MB/s)
>    Rnd read,  512KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=354, BW=177MiB/s (186MB/s)
>    Rnd read,  512KB, QD=32, 4 jobs:  IOPS=388, BW=194MiB/s (204MB/s)
>    Rnd write,   4KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=6282, BW=24.5MiB/s (25.7MB/s)
>    Rnd write,   4KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=24.9k, BW=97.5MiB/s (102MB/s)
>    Rnd write,   4KB, QD=32, 4 jobs:  IOPS=27.4k, BW=107MiB/s (112MB/s)
>    Rnd write, 128KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=1098, BW=137MiB/s (144MB/s)
>    Rnd write, 128KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=1195, BW=149MiB/s (157MB/s)
>    Rnd write, 128KB, QD=32, 4 jobs:  IOPS=1120, BW=140MiB/s (147MB/s)
>    Seq read,  128KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=936, BW=117MiB/s (123MB/s)
>    Seq read,  128KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=1218, BW=152MiB/s (160MB/s)
>    Seq read,  512KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=301, BW=151MiB/s (158MB/s)
>    Seq read,  512KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=360, BW=180MiB/s (189MB/s)
>    Seq read,    1MB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=193, BW=194MiB/s (203MB/s)
>    Seq write, 128KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=796, BW=99.5MiB/s (104MB/s)
>    Seq write, 128KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=1019, BW=127MiB/s (134MB/s)
>    Seq write, 512KB,  QD=1, 1 job :  IOPS=213, BW=107MiB/s (112MB/s)
>    Seq write, 512KB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=273, BW=137MiB/s (143MB/s)
>    Seq write,   1MB, QD=32, 1 job :  IOPS=168, BW=168MiB/s (177MB/s)
>    Rnd rdwr, 4K..1MB, QD=8, 4 jobs:  IOPS=255, BW=128MiB/s (134MB/s)
>     IOPS=266, BW=135MiB/s (141MB/s)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> ---
> Changes in v6:
> - use size_t for nburst (sashiko)
> - remove unused field (sashikio)
> - leave pause and resume as it because there are other problem for it. It
> is not fully functional, need fix later.
> - Link to v5: https://patch.msgid.link/20260709-edma_ll-v5-0-e199053d4300@nxp.com
> 
> Changes in v5:
> - Fix cover letter typo
> - Fix double subtract found by sashiko AI
> - Link to v4: https://patch.msgid.link/20260708-edma_ll-v4-0-cc128f0afb61@nxp.com
> 
> Changes in v4:
> - collect Koichiro Den test by tags
> - use addr in argument when set ll address, found by sashiko
> - fix iterate burst problem when exceed max link list, found by sashiko
> - Link to v3: https://patch.msgid.link/20260702-edma_ll-v3-0-877aa463740c@nxp.com
> 
> Changes in v3:
> - remove patch dmaengine: dw-edma: Remove ll_max = -1 in dw_edma_channel_setup()
> - rebase to vnod's dmaengine topic/config_prep_api
> - Add non-ll-start() callback to handle non-ll mode transfer
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260109-edma_ll-v2-0-5c0b27b2c664@nxp.com
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - use 'eDMA' and 'HDMA' at commit message
> - remove debug code.
> - keep 'inline' to avoid build warning
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251212-edma_ll-v1-0-fc863d9f5ca3@nxp.com
> 
> ---
> Frank Li (10):
>        dmaengine: dw-edma: Move control field update of DMA link to the last step
>        dmaengine: dw-edma: Add xfer_sz field to struct dw_edma_chunk
>        dmaengine: dw-edma: Move ll_region from struct dw_edma_chunk to struct dw_edma_chan
>        dmaengine: dw-edma: Pass down dw_edma_chan to reduce one level of indirection
>        dmaengine: dw-edma: Add helper dw_(edma|hdma)_v0_core_ch_enable()
>        dmaengine: dw-edma: Add callbacks to fill link list entries
>        dmaengine: dw-edma: Add non_ll_start() callback
>        dmaengine: dw-edma: Use common dw_edma_core_start() for both eDMA and HDMA
>        dmaengine: dw-edma: Use burst array instead of linked list
>        dmaengine: dw-edma: Remove struct dw_edma_chunk
> 
>   drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c    | 220 ++++++++-----------------------
>   drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.h    |  67 ++++++----
>   drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-core.c | 240 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
>   drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-hdma-v0-core.c | 169 ++++++++++++------------
>   4 files changed, 304 insertions(+), 392 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: c9e9927c6d8346cdf6555a8f97da093980172e4b
> change-id: 20251211-edma_ll-0904ba089f01
> 
> Best regards,
> --
> Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> 


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-10 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-10 16:47 [PATCH v6 00/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: flatten desc structions and simplify code Frank.Li
2026-07-10 16:47 ` [PATCH v6 01/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Move control field update of DMA link to the last step Frank.Li
2026-07-10 16:47 ` [PATCH v6 02/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add xfer_sz field to struct dw_edma_chunk Frank.Li
2026-07-10 16:47 ` [PATCH v6 03/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Move ll_region from struct dw_edma_chunk to struct dw_edma_chan Frank.Li
2026-07-10 16:47 ` [PATCH v6 04/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Pass down dw_edma_chan to reduce one level of indirection Frank.Li
2026-07-10 16:47 ` [PATCH v6 05/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add helper dw_(edma|hdma)_v0_core_ch_enable() Frank.Li
2026-07-10 16:47 ` [PATCH v6 06/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add callbacks to fill link list entries Frank.Li
2026-07-10 16:47 ` [PATCH v6 07/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Add non_ll_start() callback Frank.Li
2026-07-10 16:47 ` [PATCH v6 08/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Use common dw_edma_core_start() for both eDMA and HDMA Frank.Li
2026-07-10 16:47 ` [PATCH v6 09/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Use burst array instead of linked list Frank.Li
2026-07-10 16:47 ` [PATCH v6 10/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: Remove struct dw_edma_chunk Frank.Li
2026-07-10 17:23 ` [PATCH v6 00/10] dmaengine: dw-edma: flatten desc structions and simplify code Verma, Devendra
2026-07-10 17:28 ` Verma, Devendra [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a7c49756-b042-445c-b012-e5162446f9cf@amd.com \
    --to=devverma@amd.com \
    --cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
    --cc=Frank.Li@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=Gustavo.Pimentel@synopsys.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=den@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kishon@kernel.org \
    --cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox