From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: C++ and the kernel
Date: 9 Apr 2002 18:52:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a905sj$dl7$1@cesium.transmeta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020409122622.GN612@gallifrey> <Pine.LNX.3.95.1020409085537.4291B-100000@chaos.analogic.com>
Followup to: <Pine.LNX.3.95.1020409085537.4291B-100000@chaos.analogic.com>
By author: "Richard B. Johnson" <root@chaos.analogic.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> >
> > Bollox!
> >
> > There are many places in the kernel that are actually very OO - look at
> > filesystems for example. The super_operations sturcture is in effect a
> > virtual function table.
>
> The file operations structure(s) are structures. They are not object-
> oriented in any way, and they are certainly not virtual. The code that
> manipulates them is quite physical and procedural, well defined, and
> visible to the rest of the kernel.
>
Again, bollocks. The file operation structures are vanilla vtbl
implementations of virtual functions. The fact that they're written
foo->f_ops->func(foo, ...);
instead of
foo->func(...);
makes absolutely no difference whatsoever.
-hpa
--
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt <amsp@zytor.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-10 1:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-09 10:16 C++ and the kernel T. A.
2002-04-09 9:54 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-04-09 12:10 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-04-09 12:26 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2002-04-09 13:28 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-04-09 14:00 ` Chris Friesen
2002-04-09 13:55 ` Sean Neakums
2002-04-09 14:00 ` Alexander Viro
2002-04-09 14:02 ` Michael Clark
2002-04-09 14:30 ` Rik van Riel
2002-04-10 1:52 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2002-04-09 17:17 ` T. A.
2002-04-09 21:51 ` J. Dow
2002-04-09 23:11 ` Rui Sousa
2002-04-09 17:27 ` T. A.
2002-04-09 11:29 ` Erik Mouw
2002-04-09 16:21 ` Kurt Wall
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-09 16:45 Sau Dan Lee
2002-04-09 16:51 Sau Dan Lee
2002-04-09 16:58 ` Richard B. Johnson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='a905sj$dl7$1@cesium.transmeta.com' \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox