From: Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com>
To: Steve deRosier <derosier@gmail.com>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
s.hauer@pengutronix.de,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] mtd: rawnand: micron: Micron SLC NAND filling block
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 11:16:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a9529da36e73116a65a9bc8bd40b5ef54661e3d1.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALLGbR+MWz82hcC6jrv+MrH6Rhj5McW5vt9V+x4UhiZdsoqkRg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2020-05-18 at 11:32 -0700, Steve deRosier wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 7:00 AM Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
> >
> > On some legacy planar 2D Micron NAND devices when a block erase
> > command
>
> I object the use of the qualifications you're putting in this
> sentence. By saying "some legacy...." you're implying that there's a
> set that does and a set that doesn't require this. Which then leads
> the reader of this commit message to #1 look for which ones this
> applies to vs not, and #2 want to remove/exclude the feature when
> they're using a "current" device. The wiggle-word wording is
> confusing
> and dishonest.
>
> I've followed this discussion now intently and it seems like Micron
> is
> either unable or unwilling to determine which specific devices this
> does or doesn't apply to. If you are unable to identify and restrict
> this functionality to a specific subset of devices, then the fact is
> it's "all." Let's just say that and eliminate the confusion. And
> please also update your datasheets to indicate that this is the
> correct algorithm for working with these devices. Better would be to
> issue an errata on the chips and notify your customers. I feel for
> those customers who aren't using Linux and don't know the reliability
> problem they've been tracking down for the last couple of years is
> already known but they don't have any way of knowing about it.
>
> In your commit message, rewording to "On planar 2D Micron NAND
> devices
> when a block erase command..." is sufficient.
>
> - Steve
>
ok, you are native English speaker, I will take this suggestion in the
next version.
thanks.
Bean
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-19 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-18 13:59 [PATCH v4 0/5] Micron SLC NAND filling block Bean Huo
2020-05-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] mtd: rawnand: group all NAND specific ops into new nand_chip_ops Bean Huo
2020-05-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] mtd: rawnand: Add {pre,post}_erase hooks in nand_chip_ops Bean Huo
2020-05-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] mtd: rawnand: Add write_oob hook " Bean Huo
2020-05-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] mtd: rawnand: Introduce a new function nand_check_is_erased_page() Bean Huo
2020-05-18 15:11 ` kbuild test robot
2020-05-18 13:59 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] mtd: rawnand: micron: Micron SLC NAND filling block Bean Huo
2020-05-18 18:32 ` Steve deRosier
2020-05-19 9:16 ` Bean Huo [this message]
2020-05-18 15:22 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] " Miquel Raynal
2020-05-19 9:04 ` Bean Huo
2020-05-19 9:08 ` Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a9529da36e73116a65a9bc8bd40b5ef54661e3d1.camel@gmail.com \
--to=huobean@gmail.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=derosier@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox