From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 685CB39657D for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2026 12:24:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777465499; cv=none; b=i0Wp8vyXtJzMLv25T7vKIIFeLHuR+mWAMzmMUPkUlZuJ48ApRIXc3zGDk5Qj306y49XBDo4saUv6z3P5U2Ujw13AYUks2mKS5bEtT2OGNcirQw/hX/0OvLOwRwPew2urEN/+1mXgZbSTPNv4KbpQYNK46cG4VP5mINZ58V8lXBM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777465499; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IZg+5wxg2C1LFBR7NUbUqqiwcUlirYuWeBaPX0xjFMk=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=olF+IYyB+O56rx9EK/tGMQQti8L5vHumVCt7HsWmUsO88OVLfny1Nt10igx8wqrBkMMIw7AYG6BIpxZjBr3aAy/9o+FPZA4Tbug4cN5hDavt76bWi3Ba8FPSdM7UdleyAJSlR8fXTCVpu1HF8DnaOTwRZ+Kjd2laqXn1oWuw1bs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=oyMPyOLr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="oyMPyOLr" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 504F0C19425; Wed, 29 Apr 2026 12:24:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1777465499; bh=IZg+5wxg2C1LFBR7NUbUqqiwcUlirYuWeBaPX0xjFMk=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=oyMPyOLrp/vPsFWFEfEKIlSO2tQCKgcDR5Wp2cmNbmXdrSS5MvMNZeOto0ODD92dV OHojD78UAWSV9qAyY2MoWB8NYhN6Rjjs2HCnBPZmYnuSiBLPYMNSY+ReQBtmhuNNHU 4MIzPMlf7fpofDDwUtydk2Ldr/NSQ3TDASYmB4tguzM8z29zCGKTRdnCbjsbTWfFui UtSmAjfDf3kL9uMZ7mt+3KJP517a+oTXKGbMoMw3OfIuFKXM+/NpDaid3rR+a7G5kj b/ccORFIECqZq0TcFvQ+DhWvqr590g9KqDGVDosQ8enT/qTaWcw+ETzQsWE/2d0h+f Hha6M2Wb0vXBw== Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:24:55 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Linux 7.1-rc1 To: Luna Jernberg , Andy Shevchenko Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linus Torvalds , lee@kernel.org, Jani Nikula , intel-gfx-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org, Mikael Eriksson , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Greg Kroah-Hartman References: From: Hans de Goede Content-Language: en-US, nl In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Luna, Thank you for testing the rc kernels. On 29-Apr-26 09:33, Luna Jernberg wrote: > Hard to show but backlight turns on with one and not the other I see an image on both pictures, so to me it looks like the backlight is on in both cases otherwise the image would not be visible at all. I guess what you mean is that the backlight is less bright in one image vs the other image ? Have you tried changing the brightness with the brightness slider in the top right gnome shell system menu (which is open in one your 2 screenshots) ? What is the output of: ls -l /sys/class/backlight/ With the working 7.0.2 kernel ? And what is the output of the same command with the non working 7.1-rc1 kernel ? Regards, Hans