From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@gmail.com>, xulang <xulang@uniontech.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, ast@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com,
song@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org,
sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
kaiyanm@hust.edu.cn, huyinhao@hust.edu.cn, dzm91@hust.edu.cn,
kernel@uniontech.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v1] bpf: Fix OOB in bpf_obj_memcpy for cgroup storage
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 09:41:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a9e91c79-70f6-4f7e-a98a-12f2ef834c3a@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <abKo0HZ3R_oY1BUa@mail.gmail.com>
On 3/12/26 4:51 AM, Paul Chaignon wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 01:25:25PM +0800, xulang wrote:
>> From: Lang Xu <xulang@uniontech.com>
>>
>> An out-of-bounds read occurs when copying element from a
>> BPF_MAP_TYPE_CGROUP_STORAGE map to another map type with the same
>> value_size that is not 8-byte aligned.
>>
>> The issue happens when:
>> 1. A CGROUP_STORAGE map is created with value_size not aligned to
>> 8 bytes (e.g., 4 bytes)
>> 2. A HASH map is created with the same value_size (e.g., 4 bytes)
>> 3. Update element in 2 with data in 1
>>
>> In the kernel, map elements are typically aligned to 8 bytes. However,
>> bpf_cgroup_storage_calculate_size() allocates storage based on the exact
>> value_size without alignment. When copy_map_value_long() is called, it
>> assumes all map values are 8-byte aligned and rounds up the copy size,
>> leading to a 4-byte out-of-bounds read from the cgroup storage buffer.
>>
>> This patch fixes the issue by ensuring cgroup storage allocates 8-byte
>> aligned buffers, matching the assumptions in copy_map_value_long().
> I don't think this bug is specific to the CGROUP_STORAGE maps. Wouldn't
> it affect any copy from a non-percpu map into a percpu hashmap? The
> reproducer in [1] copies from a BPF_MAP_TYPE_CGROUP_STORAGE map to a
> BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH map, but I suspect you'd hit the same bug
> if copying from BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH into BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH because
> for BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH the value size is also not rounded up to a
> multiple of 8.
The BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH table have value size rounds up to 8. See:
if (percpu)
htab->elem_size += sizeof(void *);
else
htab->elem_size += round_up(htab->map.value_size, 8);
The same for array size.
>
> 1 - https://lore.kernel.org/all/14e6c70c.6c121.19c0399d948.Coremail.kaiyanm@hust.edu.cn/
>
>> Fixes: b741f1630346 ("bpf: introduce per-cpu cgroup local storage")
>> Reported-by: Kaiyan Mei <kaiyanm@hust.edu.cn>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/14e6c70c.6c121.19c0399d948.Coremail.kaiyanm@hust.edu.cn/
>> Signed-off-by: Lang Xu <xulang@uniontech.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/bpf/local_storage.c | 7 +++----
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
>> index 8fca0c64f7b1..54b32ba19194 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
>> @@ -487,14 +487,13 @@ static size_t bpf_cgroup_storage_calculate_size(struct bpf_map *map, u32 *pages)
>> {
>> size_t size;
>>
>> + size = round_up(map->value_size, 8);
>> if (cgroup_storage_type(map) == BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_SHARED) {
>> - size = sizeof(struct bpf_storage_buffer) + map->value_size;
>> + size += sizeof(struct bpf_storage_buffer);
>> *pages = round_up(sizeof(struct bpf_cgroup_storage) + size,
>> PAGE_SIZE) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> } else {
>> - size = map->value_size;
>> - *pages = round_up(round_up(size, 8) * num_possible_cpus(),
>> - PAGE_SIZE) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> + *pages = round_up(size * num_possible_cpus(), PAGE_SIZE) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> }
>>
>> return size;
>> --
>> 2.51.0
>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-12 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-12 5:25 [PATCH bpf v1] bpf: Fix OOB in bpf_obj_memcpy for cgroup storage xulang
2026-03-12 11:51 ` Paul Chaignon
2026-03-12 16:41 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2026-03-12 18:02 ` Paul Chaignon
2026-03-12 19:58 ` Yonghong Song
2026-03-12 16:46 ` Yonghong Song
2026-03-13 20:34 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-03-16 13:51 ` xulang
2026-03-16 20:50 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-03-16 21:22 ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-03-17 10:02 ` [PATCH bpf 0/2] bpf: Fix and test cgroup storage OOB issue xulang
[not found] ` <20260317100227.2157104-1-xulang@uniontech.com>
2026-03-17 10:02 ` [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf: Fix OOB in bpf_obj_memcpy for cgroup storage xulang
2026-03-25 1:36 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-03-17 10:02 ` [PATCH bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for cgroup storage OOB read xulang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a9e91c79-70f6-4f7e-a98a-12f2ef834c3a@linux.dev \
--to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dzm91@hust.edu.cn \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=huyinhao@hust.edu.cn \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kaiyanm@hust.edu.cn \
--cc=kernel@uniontech.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=paul.chaignon@gmail.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=xulang@uniontech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox