public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>,
	Dmitri Prokhorov <Dmitry.Prohorov@intel.com>,
	Valery Cherepennikov <valery.cherepennikov@intel.com>,
	David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2]: perf/core: addressing 4x slowdown during per-process, profiling of STREAM benchmark on Intel Xeon Phi
Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 13:46:38 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a9f671bf-503b-896a-c072-1fbeab9bb029@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170529103343.rqy37cxnp6zsbnap@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 29.05.2017 13:33, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 12:24:53PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
>> On 29.05.2017 10:45, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 02:19:51PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
>>>> Solution:
>>>>
>>>> cpu indexed trees for perf_event_context::pinned_groups and
>>>> perf_event_context::flexible_groups lists are introduced. Every tree node
>>>> keeps a list of groups allocated for the same cpu. A tree references only
>>>> groups located at the appropriate group list. The tree provides capability
>>>> to iterate over groups allocated for a specific cpu only, what is exactly
>>>> required by multiplexing timer interrupt handler. The handler runs per-cpu
>>>> and enables/disables groups using group_sched_in()/group_sched_out() that
>>>> call event_filter_match() function filtering out groups allocated for cpus
>>>> different from the one executing the handler. Additionally for every
>>>> filtered out group group_sched_out() updates tstamps values to the current
>>>> interrupt time. This updating work is now done only once by
>>>> update_context_time() called by ctx_sched_out() before cpu groups
>>>> iteration. For this trick to work it is required that tstamps of filtered
>>>> out events would point to perf_event_context::tstamp_data object instead
>>>> of perf_event::tstamp_data ones, as it is initialized from an event
>>>> allocation. tstamps references are switched by
>>>> group_sched_in()/group_sched_out() every time a group is checked for its
>>>> suitability for currently running cpu. When a thread enters some cpu on
>>>> a context switch a long run through pinned and flexible groups is
>>>> performed by perf_event_sched_in(, mux=0) with new parameter mux set to 0
>>>> and filtered out groups tstamps are switched to
>>>> perf_event_context::tstamp_data object. Then a series of multiplexing
>>>> interrupts happens and the handler rotates the flexible groups calling
>>>> ctx_sched_out(,mux=1)/perf_event_sched_in(,mux=1) iterating over the cpu
>>>> tree lists only and avoiding long runs through the complete group lists.
>>>> This is where speedup comes from. Eventually when the thread leaves the cpu
>>>> ctx_sched_out(,mux=0) is called restoring tstamps pointers to the events'
>>>> perf_event::tstamp_data objects.
>>>
>>> This is unreadable.. Please use whitespace.
>>
>> Do you mean do NOT use whitespaces? Could you explain in more detail what
>> you mean?
> 
> No, add _more_ whitespace. Use things like paragraphs and such. Reading
> a massive blob of text like that is painful. Also use full and complete
> sentences. For example, the very first sentence:
> 
>   'cpu indexed trees for perf_event_context::pinned_groups and
>   perf_event_context::flexible_groups lists are introduced.'
> 
> feels incomplete and leaves one wondering what for etc.. And it only
> gets worse.
> 

Makes sense. Will do. Thanks.

> 
>>> Yeah, this doesn't go into a changelog. Have you _ever_ seen a changelog
>>> with such crud in?
>>>
>>
>> I have not. Could you please advise how to format this information to be
>> suitable for changelog, if it's required at all?
> 
> Don't include it. It should be fairly obvious from the diff itself what
> changed after all.
> 

Ok. Clear.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-29 10:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-26 22:13 [PATCH]: perf/core: addressing 4x slowdown during per-process profiling of STREAM benchmark on Intel Xeon Phi Alexey Budankov
2017-05-27 11:19 ` [PATCH v2]: perf/core: addressing 4x slowdown during per-process, " Alexey Budankov
2017-05-29  7:45   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-29  9:24     ` Alexey Budankov
2017-05-29 10:33       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-29 10:46         ` Alexey Budankov [this message]
2017-05-29  7:46   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-29  9:15     ` Alexey Budankov
2017-05-29 10:43       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-29 10:56         ` Alexey Budankov
2017-05-29 11:23           ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-29 11:45             ` Alexey Budankov
2017-06-15 17:42               ` Alexey Budankov
2017-06-21 15:39                 ` Alexey Budankov
2017-06-30 10:22                   ` Alexey Budankov
2017-05-31 21:33   ` David Carrillo-Cisneros
2017-06-14 11:27     ` Alexey Budankov
2017-05-29 12:03 ` [PATCH]: perf/core: addressing 4x slowdown during per-process " Alexander Shishkin
2017-05-29 13:43   ` Alexey Budankov
2017-05-29 15:22     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-29 15:29       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-05-29 16:41         ` Alexey Budankov
2017-05-30  8:29     ` Alexander Shishkin
2017-06-14 10:07       ` Alexey Budankov
2017-06-15 17:44         ` Alexey Budankov
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-05-31  0:04 [PATCH v2]: perf/core: addressing 4x slowdown during per-process, " Arun Kalyanasundaram
2017-06-14 12:26 ` Alexey Budankov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a9f671bf-503b-896a-c072-1fbeab9bb029@linux.intel.com \
    --to=alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Dmitry.Prohorov@intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davidcc@google.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=valery.cherepennikov@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox