From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B55986AD3 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2025 18:55:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745693757; cv=none; b=nRB6TeAKLZB3ldjJHlxjCvN67JD0duKR80AjGcAJQ/RCd87MUpJB4GjMF1y5pC3NdCFR/msAIUVpICZtEjWO9wKiSwZQWFT/O6NESHkEsl4oH/eAw1NYRntZTitw0HhA+6EJkmYUXw+Tj6gXhZU38yVHURjvtovgjcPAsc/YwQE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745693757; c=relaxed/simple; bh=F0vG+nDcCONKZs4e6RtOitQ9n8Mz1fjCVmRW/ho89E4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=iyT0lIyB7GhPHdEGOTPHRQWWOgj+nrgWc3s+j1bYGdcz+f7SfO30w9GuShMJxWTYabCvpIlvQl5RX4Bm5LycrIP2awI4jzJN5yhOc09B1A8unctzPEosi2EfEzHhi80h+6chsrhb7Vt2tf1KTboCQz2EtHDBLCZO/vVchWqWo/M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=C+3VZhA2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="C+3VZhA2" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AAC84C4CEE2; Sat, 26 Apr 2025 18:55:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1745693756; bh=F0vG+nDcCONKZs4e6RtOitQ9n8Mz1fjCVmRW/ho89E4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=C+3VZhA2rqQfpKTKP2m4yO0DolUCdMwEmkMYv15ph8vW2QWnr+dwsgrdPEDAa+XKU cT+lBTivJUJbXq+YwDynrxuVGxxd7bxMoEAer2TcpR5Z/80KWu1DFGnJTMAWfaqwHp Wt4Jx4tgNhuiLnQ6Uh2yFQ/qvjnnEMx6H4ogxz68sX4Wr+dcBgU5QN/U2h2Uj0/Z1G PhGfSzqlUafQ7G0XaImHK804liJwS1k4ojK4L0zZghvVKYBfY33rV6LPviVBGb4Iu6 DYFyY1v4Quv3vP2Oe2ssiS64YmX/cVrSFbo0ye/YxMwYHLtMptqvYcMDxuiFBr260w jjSeafo4hNDdA== Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2025 20:55:50 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Juergen Gross , Boris Ostrovsky , Alexander Usyskin , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Mateusz =?utf-8?Q?Jo=C5=84czyk?= , "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" , Ard Biesheuvel , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] x86/cpu: rework instruction set selection Message-ID: References: <20250425141740.734030-1-arnd@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: * H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Dropping CMOV would mean dropping P5 support. Yeah, I think we should make the cutoff at the 686 level. Is there any strong reason not to do that? Stable kernels will still exist for a very long time for ancient boards. Ingo