From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
To: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
Cc: John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>,
Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com>,
David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: ralink: Avoid x/x division in rt_timer_config()
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 10:18:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aA3oWzkUP3CYbShi@alpha.franken.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250408082804.796515-2-thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 10:28:05AM +0200, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> Avoid the 'rt->timer_freq / rt->timer_freq' division when the divisor is
> larger than the timer frequency and use '1' directly.
>
> No functional changes intended.
>
> Suggested-by: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
> ---
> arch/mips/ralink/timer.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/ralink/timer.c b/arch/mips/ralink/timer.c
> index 54094f6e033e..5d8286603584 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/ralink/timer.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/ralink/timer.c
> @@ -75,12 +75,16 @@ static int rt_timer_request(struct rt_timer *rt)
>
> static int rt_timer_config(struct rt_timer *rt, unsigned long divisor)
> {
> - if (rt->timer_freq < divisor)
> + u32 t;
> +
> + if (rt->timer_freq < divisor) {
> rt->timer_div = rt->timer_freq;
> - else
> + t = 1;
> + } else {
> rt->timer_div = divisor;
> -
> - rt_timer_w32(rt, TIMER_REG_TMR0LOAD, rt->timer_freq / rt->timer_div);
> + t = rt->timer_freq / rt->timer_div;
> + }
> + rt_timer_w32(rt, TIMER_REG_TMR0LOAD, t);
I really don't see the point for this change. IMHO, this isn't really
runtime critical and I prefer the code like it is at the moment.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-27 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-08 8:28 [PATCH] MIPS: ralink: Avoid x/x division in rt_timer_config() Thorsten Blum
2025-04-27 8:18 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer [this message]
2025-04-27 9:25 ` Sergio Paracuellos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aA3oWzkUP3CYbShi@alpha.franken.de \
--to=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=john@phrozen.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sergio.paracuellos@gmail.com \
--cc=thorsten.blum@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox