linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Ahmed S . Darwish" <darwi@linutronix.de>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] x86/atomics: Remove !CONFIG_X86_CX8 methods
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 10:23:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aA3pj0yVIizZPRxT@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMzpN2jNPxAF75iuNwNjz7PqYygYgLeCM77rQV2ZCj=o6-qJDQ@mail.gmail.com>


* Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 10:30 AM Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 25. 04. 25 10:42, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > > -#endif
> > > +#define arch_cmpxchg64                       __cmpxchg64
> > > +#define arch_cmpxchg64_local         __cmpxchg64_local
> > > +#define arch_try_cmpxchg64           __try_cmpxchg64
> > > +#define arch_try_cmpxchg64_local     __try_cmpxchg64_local
> > >
> > >   #define system_has_cmpxchg64()              boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CX8)
> >
> > #define system_has_cmpxchg64()          1
> 
> Or just outright removed, since x86 was the only arch that defined it.

No, it cannot be removed, x86-32 *is* still the only 32-bit arch that 
enables it.

I.e. defining it to 1 is the correct solution, and that unconditionally 
enables the SLUB code optimizations. It depended on a runtime 
boot_cpu_has() check before.

Removing it would remove the optimization from x86-32 for no good 
reason.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-27  8:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-25  8:41 [RFC PATCH 0/15] x86: Remove support for TSC-less and CX8-less CPUs Ingo Molnar
2025-04-25  8:41 ` [PATCH 01/15] x86/cpu: Remove M486/M486SX/ELAN support Ingo Molnar
2025-04-25  8:41 ` [PATCH 02/15] x86/cpu: Remove CONFIG_MWINCHIP3D/MWINCHIPC6 Ingo Molnar
2025-04-25  8:42 ` [PATCH 03/15] x86/cpu: Remove CPU_SUP_UMC_32 support Ingo Molnar
2025-04-25  8:42 ` [PATCH 04/15] x86/cpu: Remove TSC-less CONFIG_M586 support Ingo Molnar
2025-04-25 15:09   ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-25  8:42 ` [PATCH 05/15] x86/cpu, x86/platform, watchdog: Remove CONFIG_X86_RDC321X support Ingo Molnar
2025-04-25  8:42 ` [PATCH 06/15] x86/cpu: Remove the CONFIG_X86_INVD_BUG quirk Ingo Molnar
2025-04-25  8:42 ` [PATCH 07/15] x86/cpu, cpufreq: Remove AMD ELAN support Ingo Molnar
2025-04-25  8:42 ` [PATCH 08/15] x86/fpu: Remove MATH_EMULATION and related glue code Ingo Molnar
2025-04-25  8:42 ` [PATCH 09/15] x86/fpu: Remove the 'no387' boot option Ingo Molnar
2025-04-25  8:42 ` [PATCH 10/15] x86/fpu: Remove the math-emu/ FPU emulation library Ingo Molnar
2025-04-25  8:42 ` [PATCH 11/15] x86/cpu: Make CONFIG_X86_TSC unconditional Ingo Molnar
2025-04-25  8:42 ` [PATCH 12/15] x86: Remove !CONFIG_X86_TSC code Ingo Molnar
2025-04-25  8:42 ` [PATCH 13/15] x86/cpu: Make CONFIG_X86_CX8 unconditional Ingo Molnar
2025-04-25 12:10   ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-04-25 15:15     ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-25 21:54       ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-04-27  9:25         ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-27 17:32           ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-04-27 21:26             ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-28  9:16             ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-28 11:21               ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-04-29 10:22                 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-29 12:10                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-04-27  8:15     ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-25  8:42 ` [PATCH 14/15] x86/percpu: Remove !CONFIG_X86_CX8 methods Ingo Molnar
2025-04-25 14:05   ` Uros Bizjak
2025-04-27  7:46     ` [PATCH -v2 " Ingo Molnar
2025-04-25  8:42 ` [PATCH 15/15] x86/atomics: " Ingo Molnar
2025-04-25 13:55   ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-04-25 14:10   ` Uros Bizjak
2025-04-25 15:00     ` Brian Gerst
2025-04-27  8:23       ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2025-04-27  8:26     ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-27 10:31       ` Uros Bizjak
2025-05-15  8:49         ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-25 11:13 ` [RFC PATCH 0/15] x86: Remove support for TSC-less and CX8-less CPUs Arnd Bergmann
2025-04-26  8:26 ` Pavel Machek
2025-05-05  8:53 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-05-05 12:48   ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-05-05 13:04     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-05-05 19:57       ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-05-05 20:54         ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-06 13:51           ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-05-06 14:16             ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-08 14:51               ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-05-08 20:11                 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-12 12:55                   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-05-12 13:48                     ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-12 17:29                       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-05-13  2:00                         ` Linus Torvalds
2025-05-13  3:48                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-05-13  5:43                           ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2025-05-13 21:55                             ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-05-13 22:02                               ` Linus Torvalds
2025-05-13 22:06                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-05-15 16:32                                 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-05-06 13:48         ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-05-06 13:54           ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2025-05-05 15:59   ` Linus Torvalds
2025-05-06 13:53     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-05-06 16:44       ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-05-06 17:11         ` Linus Torvalds
2025-05-06 17:51           ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-05-08 14:54             ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-05-08 14:53           ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2025-05-08 14:51         ` Maciej W. Rozycki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aA3pj0yVIizZPRxT@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=darwi@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).